Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: which staging systems best predict prognosis?
- PMID: 20458042
- PMCID: PMC3651603
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.9895
Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: which staging systems best predict prognosis?
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of cancer staging systems is to accurately predict patient prognosis. The outcome of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) depends on both the cancer stage and the extent of liver dysfunction. Many staging systems that include both aspects have been developed. It remains unknown, however, which of these systems is optimal for predicting patient survival.
Patients and methods: Patients with advanced HCC treated over a 5-year period at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center were identified from an electronic medical record database. Patients with sufficient data for utilization in all staging systems were included. TNM sixth edition, Okuda, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC), Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP), Chinese University Prognostic Index (CUPI), Japan Integrated Staging (JIS), and Groupe d'Etude et de Traitement du Carcinome Hepatocellulaire (GETCH) systems were ranked on the basis of their accuracy at predicting survival by using concordance index (c-index). Other independent prognostic variables were also identified.
Results: Overall, 187 eligible patients were identified and were staged by using the seven staging systems. CLIP, CUPI, and GETCH were the three top-ranking staging systems. BCLC and TNM sixth edition lacked any meaningful prognostic discrimination. Performance status, AST, abdominal pain, and esophageal varices improved the discriminatory ability of CLIP.
Conclusion: In our selected patient population, CLIP, CUPI, and GETCH were the most informative staging systems in predicting survival in patients with advanced HCC. Prospective validation is required to determine if they can be accurately used to stratify patients in clinical trials and to direct the appropriate need for systemic therapy versus best supportive care. BCLC and TNM sixth edition were not helpful in predicting survival outcome, and their use is not supported by our data.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
Figures

Comment in
-
Back to basics: staging and prognosis in HCC for medical oncologist.J Hepatol. 2012 Feb;56(2):488-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.06.023. Epub 2011 Jul 26. J Hepatol. 2012. PMID: 21798220 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Prognosis of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of seven staging systems (TNM, Okuda, BCLC, CLIP, CUPI, JIS, CIS) in a Chinese cohort.PLoS One. 2014 Mar 7;9(3):e88182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088182. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24609114 Free PMC article.
-
Prognosis of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients enrolled in clinical trials can be classified by current staging systems.Br J Cancer. 2012 Nov 6;107(10):1672-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.466. Epub 2012 Oct 11. Br J Cancer. 2012. PMID: 23059748 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of current staging systems for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma not amendable to locoregional therapy as inclusion criteria for clinical trials.Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2013 Mar;9(1):86-92. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12050. Epub 2012 Dec 27. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23279888
-
Prognostic staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (CLIP score): its value and limitations, and a proposal for a new staging system, the Japan Integrated Staging Score (JIS score).J Gastroenterol. 2003;38(3):207-15. doi: 10.1007/s005350300038. J Gastroenterol. 2003. PMID: 12673442 Review.
-
Updated treatment approach to hepatocellular carcinoma.J Gastroenterol. 2005 Mar;40(3):225-35. doi: 10.1007/s00535-005-1566-3. J Gastroenterol. 2005. PMID: 15830281 Review.
Cited by
-
Development and Validation a Nomogram for Predicting Overall Survival in Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.Front Surg. 2021 May 17;8:659422. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.659422. eCollection 2021. Front Surg. 2021. PMID: 34079814 Free PMC article.
-
Upregulation of FAM83D affects the proliferation and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma.Oncotarget. 2015 Sep 15;6(27):24132-47. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4432. Oncotarget. 2015. PMID: 26125229 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants of survival after sorafenib failure in patients with BCLC-C hepatocellular carcinoma in real-world practice.Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Apr;94(14):e688. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000688. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015. PMID: 25860213 Free PMC article.
-
A nomogram to predict prognosis of patients with lung adenosquamous carcinoma: a population-based study.J Thorac Dis. 2020 May;12(5):2288-2303. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.03.115. J Thorac Dis. 2020. PMID: 32642134 Free PMC article.
-
Decreased Expression of TMEM173 Predicts Poor Prognosis in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.PLoS One. 2016 Nov 4;11(11):e0165681. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165681. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27814372 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abou-Alfa GK. Selection of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma for sorafenib. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009;7:397–403. - PubMed
-
- Lei HJ, Chau GY, Lui WY, et al. Prognostic value and clinical relevance of the 6th Edition 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:426–435. - PubMed
-
- Okuda K, Ohtsuki T, Obata H, et al. Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma and prognosis in relation to treatment: Study of 850 patients. Cancer. 1985;56:918–928. - PubMed
-
- Llovet JM, Brú C, Bruix J. Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: The BCLC staging classification. Sem Liv Dis. 1999;19:329–338. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical