Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Jun 20;28(18):2966-73.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.9549. Epub 2010 May 10.

Classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil chemotherapy is more effective in triple-negative, node-negative breast cancer: results from two randomized trials of adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy for node-negative breast cancer

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil chemotherapy is more effective in triple-negative, node-negative breast cancer: results from two randomized trials of adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy for node-negative breast cancer

Marco Colleoni et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Retrospective studies suggest that primary breast cancers lacking estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) and not overexpressing human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2; triple-negative tumors) are particularly sensitive to DNA-damaging chemotherapy with alkylating agents.

Patients and methods: Patients enrolled in International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials VIII and IX with node-negative, operable breast cancer and centrally assessed ER, PR, and HER2 were included (n = 2,257). The trials compared three or six courses of adjuvant classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) with or without endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone. We explored patterns of recurrence by treatment according to three immunohistochemically defined tumor subtypes: triple negative, HER2 positive and endocrine receptor absent, and endocrine receptor present.

Results: Patients with triple-negative tumors (303 patients; 13%) were significantly more likely to have tumors > 2 cm and grade 3 compared with those in the HER2-positive, endocrine receptor-absent, and endocrine receptor-present subtypes. No clear chemotherapy benefit was observed in endocrine receptor-present disease (hazard ratio [HR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.11). A statistically significantly greater benefit for chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy was observed in triple-negative breast cancer (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.73; interaction P = .009 v endocrine receptor-present disease). The magnitude of the chemotherapy effect was lower in HER2-positive endocrine receptor-absent disease (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.29 to 1.17; interaction P = .24 v endocrine receptor-present disease).

Conclusion: The magnitude of benefit of CMF chemotherapy is largest in patients with triple-negative, node-negative breast cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Estimated subtype-specific cumulative incidence of relapse over time according to treatment group (CMF [cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil] chemotherapy v no CMF chemotherapy) for patients with (A) triple-negative, (B) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –positive, endocrine receptor–absent, or (C) endocrine receptor–present tumors.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Estimated subtype-specific cumulative incidence of relapse over time according to treatment group (CMF [cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil] chemotherapy v no CMF chemotherapy) for premenopausal patients in International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trial VIII with (A) triple-negative tumors, (B) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –positive, endocrine receptor–absent tumors, or (C) endocrine receptor–present tumors and for postmenopausal patients in IBCSG Trial IX with (D) triple-negative tumors, (E) HER2-positive, endocrine receptor–absent tumors, or (F) endocrine receptor–present tumors.
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) comparing patients assigned to CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil) chemotherapy with patients assigned to no CMF chemotherapy with triple-negative (A,D), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –positive, endocrine receptor–absent (B,E), and endocrine receptor–present (C,F) subtypes. Pts, patients; yr, year.
Fig A1.
Fig A1.
Estimated subtype-specific cumulative incidence of relapse over time according to treatment group (CMF [cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil] chemotherapy v no CMF chemotherapy) for patients with (A) triple-negative, (B) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive, endocrine-nonresponsive, or (C) endocrine-responsive tumors.
Fig A2.
Fig A2.
Estimated subtype-specific cumulative incidence of relapse over time according to treatment group (CMF [cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil] chemotherapy v no CMF chemotherapy) for premenopausal patients in International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trial VIII with (A) triple-negative, (B) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –positive, endocrine-nonresponsive, or (C) endocrine-responsive tumors and for postmenopausal patients in IBCSG Trial IX with (D) triple-negative, (E) HER2-positive, endocrine-nonresponsive, or (F) endocrine-responsive tumors.
Fig A3.
Fig A3.
Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) comparing patients assigned to CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil) chemotherapy with patients assigned to no CMF chemotherapy for triple-negative (A,D), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive, endocrine-nonresponsive (B,E), and endocrine-responsive (C,F) subtypes. yr, year; Pts, patients.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Goldhirsch A, Ingle JN, Gelber RD, et al. Thresholds for therapies: Highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:1319–1329. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000;406:747–752. - PubMed
    1. Sørlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:10869–10874. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sørlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J, et al. Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:8418–8423. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yehiely F, Moyano JV, Evans JR, et al. Deconstructing the molecular portrait of basal-like breast cancer. Trends Mol Med. 2006;12:537–544. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms