Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Nov;27(10):791-6.
doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1254238. Epub 2010 May 10.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes of repeat cesarean delivery in women with a prior classical versus low transverse uterine incision

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Maternal and neonatal outcomes of repeat cesarean delivery in women with a prior classical versus low transverse uterine incision

Tiki Bakhshi et al. Am J Perinatol. 2010 Nov.

Abstract

We compared maternal and neonatal outcomes following repeat cesarean delivery (CD) of women with a prior classical CD with those with a prior low transverse CD. The Maternal Fetal Medicine Units Network Cesarean Delivery Registry was used to identify women with one previous CD who underwent an elective repeat CD prior to the onset of labor at ≥36 weeks. Outcomes were compared between women with a previous classical CD and those with a prior low transverse CD. Of the 7936 women who met study criteria, 122 had a prior classical CD. Women with a prior classical CD had a higher rate of classical uterine incision at repeat CD (12.73% versus 0.59%; P < 0.001), had longer total operative time and hospital stay, and had higher intensive care unit admission. Uterine dehiscence was more frequent in women with a prior classical CD (2.46% versus 0.27%, odds ratio 9.35, 95% confidence interval 1.76 to 31.93). After adjusting for confounding factors, there were no statistical differences in major maternal or neonatal morbidities between groups. Uterine dehiscence was present at repeat CD in 2.46% of women with a prior classical CD. However, major maternal morbidities were similar to those with a prior low transverse CD.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Cunningham GC, Leveno KJ, Hauth JC, Bloom SL, Gilstrap L, Wenstrom KD. William’s Obstetrics. 22nd Ed McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc; New York: 2005.
    1. Gabbe S, Niebyl J, Simpson JL. Obstetrics: Normal and problem pregnancies. 5th ed Churchill Livingstone; Philadelphia: 2007.
    1. Greene RA, Fitzpatrick C, Turner MJ. What are the maternal implications of a classical caesarean section? J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Jul;18(4):345–7. - PubMed
    1. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Miodovnik M, Carpenter M, Peaceman AM, O’Sullivan MJ, Sibai B, Langer O, Thorp JM, Ramin SM, Mercer BM, Gabbe SG, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(25):2581–2589. - PubMed
    1. Halperin ME, Moore DC, Hannah WJ. Classical versus low-segment transverse incision for preterm caesarean section: Maternal complications and outcome of subsequent pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988 Oct;95(10):990–6. - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding