Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Aug;12(8):592-600.
doi: 10.1016/j.jfms.2010.02.001. Epub 2010 May 9.

A survey of the methods used in shelter and rescue programs to identify feral and frightened pet cats

Margaret R Slater  1 , Katherine A Miller, Emily Weiss, Kathleen V Makolinski, Lila A M Weisbrot
Affiliations

A survey of the methods used in shelter and rescue programs to identify feral and frightened pet cats

Margaret R Slater et al. J Feline Med Surg. 2010 Aug.

Abstract

Despite the lack of validated methods for differentiating feral from frightened socialized cats upon intake to animal welfare agencies, these organizations must make handling and disposition decisions for millions of cats each year based on their presumed socialization status. We conducted a nationwide survey of feline welfare stakeholders to learn about methods used to evaluate and categorize incoming cats, amount of time cats are held before assessment, disposition options available, and the level of cooperation among welfare agencies to minimize euthanasia of ferals. A wide variety of assessment methods were described and only 15% of 555 respondents had written guidelines. Holding periods of 1-3 days were common, and cats deemed feral were often euthanased. About half the shelters transferred ferals to trap-neuter-return (TNR) programs at least occasionally. Results highlight the need for validated assessment methods to facilitate judicious holding and disposition decisions for unowned cats at time of intake.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Locations of the 496 United States respondents to this survey who provided a location.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Patronek G.J., Beck A.M., Glickman T. Dynamics of dog and cat populations in a community, J Am Vet Med Assoc 210, 1997, 637–642. - PubMed
    1. New J.C., Kelch W.J., Hutchison J.M., et al. Birth and death rate estimates of cats and dogs in US households and related factors, J Appl Anim Welfare Sci 7, 2004, 229–242. - PubMed
    1. Levy J.K., Woods J.E., Turick S.L., Etheridge D.L. Number of unowned free-roaming cats in a college community in the southern United States and characteristics of community residents who feed them, J Am Vet Med Assoc 223, 2003, 202–205. - PubMed
    1. Clancy E.A., Rowan A.N. Companion animal demographics in the United States: a historical perspective. Salem D.J., Rowan A.N. State of the animals II: 2003, 2003, Humane Society Press: Washington, DC, 9–26.
    1. Lord L.K., Wittum T.E., Ferketich A.K., Funk J.A., Rajala-Schultz P., Kauffman R.M. Demographic trends for animal care and control agencies in Ohio from 1996 to 2004, J Am Vet Med Assoc 229, 2006, 48–54. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources