Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 May 15;70(10):3955-64.
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3773. Epub 2010 May 11.

Expression of LIGHT/TNFSF14 combined with vaccination against human papillomavirus Type 16 E7 induces significant tumor regression

Affiliations

Expression of LIGHT/TNFSF14 combined with vaccination against human papillomavirus Type 16 E7 induces significant tumor regression

Shreya Kanodia et al. Cancer Res. .

Abstract

LIGHT, a ligand for the lymphotoxin-beta receptor, establishes lymphoid-like tissues inside tumor sites and recruits naïve T cells into the tumor. However, whether these infiltrating T cells are specific for tumor antigens is not known. We hypothesized that therapy with LIGHT can expand functional tumor-specific CD8(+) T cells that can be boosted using HPV16E6E7-Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus replicon particles (HPV16-VRP) and that this combined therapy can eradicate human papillomavirus 16 (HPV16)-induced tumors. Our data show that forced expression of LIGHT in tumors results in an increase in expression of IFNgamma and chemoattractant cytokines such as interleukin-1a, MIG, and macrophage inflammatory protein-2 within the tumor and that this tumor microenvironment correlates with an increase in frequency of tumor-infiltrating CD8(+) T cells. Forced expression of LIGHT also results in the expansion of functional T cells that recognize multiple tumor antigens, including HPV16 E7, and these T cells prevent the outgrowth of tumors on secondary challenge. Subsequent boosting of E7-specific T cells by vaccination with HPV16-VRP significantly increases their frequency in both the periphery and the tumor and leads to the eradication of large well-established tumors, for which either treatment alone is not successful. These data establish the safety of Ad-LIGHT as a therapeutic intervention in preclinical studies and suggest that patients with HPV16(+) tumors may benefit from combined immunotherapy with LIGHT and antigen-specific vaccination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Therapy of well-established C3.43 tumors with HPV16-VRP alone results in an expansion of HPV16 E7-specific T-cells but does not induce significant tumor regression
Tumor-bearing mice were treated with either VRP-CTRL (GFP-VRP) or HPV16-VRP. (A & B) Average tumor volumes ± SEM and survival are plotted against days after tumor challenge (n=10 per group). (C) Lymphocytes isolated from individual spleens (n=5 per group) or tumors of HPV16-VRP vaccinated mice were analyzed by FACS and the average frequency of CD8+/CD3+/E7-tetramer+ cells is shown. (D) IFN-gamma ELISPOT assay was used to detect functional tumor-specific T-cells after stimulation with the HPV16 E7(49-57) peptide (n=5 per group).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Forced expression of LIGHT induces the expansion of HPV16 E7-specific T-cells and significantly increases T-cell infiltration into C3.43 tumors
Individual spleens and draining lymph nodes were harvested 7 days after last treatment from tumor-bearing mice treated with either Ad-LIGHT or Ad-CTRL (n=5 per group). CD8+ T-cells were isolated by MACS sorting and incubated with HPV16 E7(49–57)/H-2Db tetramer, anti-CD3 and anti-CD8 antibodies. Cells were analyzed by FACS and gating was done on CD8+ cells. (A) Upper right-hand quadrant shows frequency of CD8+/CD3+/E7-tetramer+ cells in pooled lymphocytes. (B) Average frequency of CD8+/CD3+/E7-tetramer+ cells in splenocytes. (C) TILS were isolated from tumors, stained with anti-CD3 and anti-CD8 antibodies. Average frequency of CD3+CD8+ cells is shown.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Forced expression of LIGHT in C3.43 tumors induces increased expression of IFNg and chemokines
Three groups of 5 tumor-bearing mice were left either untreated or treated with Ad-CTRL or treated with Ad-LIGHT. On day 24, tumors were resected and homogenized. Intra-tumoral cytokines and chemokines were measured. Cytokine/chemokine concentration per gram of tumor ± SD is shown.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Forced expression of LIGHT in C3.43 tumors induces functional T-cells that are specific for multiple tumor antigens and increases survival of tumor-bearing mice
Groups of 5 tumor-bearing mice treated with either Ad-LIGHT or Ad-CTRL. IFN-gamma ELISPOT assay was used to detect functional peptide-specific T-cells in individual spleens. (A) HPV16 E7(49-57) (B) Ampitope (SSPVNSLRNVV) peptide (C & D) Tumor growth was monitored in groups of 10 tumor-bearing mice treated with either Ad-LIGHT or Ad-CTRL. Average tumor volumes ± SEM and survival are plotted against days after tumor challenge.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Forced expression of LIGHT in primary tumors prevents outgrowth of tumors upon secondary challenge
Groups of 10 tumor-bearing mice were treated with either Ad-LIGHT or Ad-CTRL. On day 24 after challenge, primary tumors were resected from the right flank and mice were given a secondary tumor challenge on the left flank. Percent survival is plotted against days after secondary tumor challenge (n=8 analyzed per group).
Figure 6
Figure 6. Vaccination with HPV16-VRP boosts the frequency of tumor-specific T-cells induced by intra-tumoral expression of LIGHT and leads to significant survival
Tumor-bearing mice treated with either Ad-CTRL (Ad-LacZ) or Ad-LIGHT followed by treatment with either VRP-CTRL (GFP-VRP) or HPV16-VRP. (A) TILS were analyzed by FACS and the average frequency of CD8+/CD3+/E7-tetramer+ TILS is shown (n=5 per group). (B) IFN-gamma ELISPOT assay was used to detect functional tumor-specific T-cells from individual spleens after stimulation with both the Ampitope and E7(49-57) peptides (n=5 per group). (C & D) Average tumor volumes ± SEM and survival are plotted against days after tumor challenge (n=10 per group).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nasiell K, Roger V, Nasiell M. Behavior of mild cervical dysplasia during long-term follow-up. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;67:665–9. - PubMed
    1. Benton C, Shyahidullah H, Hunter JAM. Human papillomavirus in the immunocompromised. Papillomavirus Rep. 1999;3:23–6.
    1. Laga M, Icenogle JP, Marsella R, Manoka AT, Nzila N, Ryder RW, et al. Genital papillomavirus infection and cervical dysplasia--opportunistic complications of HIV infection. IntJCancer. 1992;50:45–8. - PubMed
    1. Maiman M, Fruchter RG, Serur E, Remy JC, Feuer G, Boyce J. Human immunodeficiency virus infection and cervical neoplasia. GynecolOncol. 1990;38:377–82. - PubMed
    1. Rudlinger R, Smith IW, Bunney MH, Hunter JA. Human papillomavirus infections in a group of renal transplant recipients. BrJDermatol. 1986;115:681–92. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances