Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct;257(10):1654-60.
doi: 10.1007/s00415-010-5589-1. Epub 2010 May 12.

Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in subgroups of multiple sclerosis, measured by optical coherence tomography and scanning laser polarimetry

Affiliations

Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in subgroups of multiple sclerosis, measured by optical coherence tomography and scanning laser polarimetry

Theodora A M Siepman et al. J Neurol. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and scanning laser polarimetry (GDx ECC) are non-invasive methods used to assess retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, which may be a reliable tool used to monitor axonal loss in multiple sclerosis (MS). The objectives of this study are (1) to compare OCT with the GDx ECC; (2) to assess and compare the RNFL thickness in subgroups of MS. Ophthalmologic examination and RNFL assessment by OCT and GDx were performed in 65 MS patients (26 relapsing-remitting (RRMS), ten secondary-progressive (SPMS), 29 primary-progressive (PPMS)). Twenty-eight patients (43%) had a history of optic neuritis (ON). Adjustments were made for age and disease duration. RNFL thickness was reduced in eyes with previous ON (p < 0.01). No differences were found between PPMS and relapse-onset MS. OCT and GDx ECC measurements were moderately correlated (rho = 0.73, p < 0.01). Visual field-mean deviation (MD) values correlated with OCT means (r = 0.44, p < 0.01) and GDx ECC TSNIT average (r = 0.41, p < 0.01). In patients without previous ON, EDSS correlated with MD (r = -0.36, p < 0.01), visual field-pattern standard deviation (PSD) (r = 0.30, p < 0.05), OCT means (r = -0.31-0.30, p < 0.05) and macular volume (r = -0.37, p < 0.01). For MSIS-29 physical impact score, significant correlations were found with MD (r = -0.48, p < 0.01) and PSD (r = 0.48, p < 0.01).

Conclusions: No differences between PPMS and relapse-onset MS subgroups were found. RNFL thickness was reduced in eyes with previous ON. Although OCT and GDx ECC findings were moderately correlated and showed significant correlations with measures of visual function in patients without previous ON, EDSS correlated significantly with visual and OCT measures, but not with GDx ECC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
GDx and OCT measurements for MS eyes without ON and MS ON eyes. GDx and OCT adjusted for age and time since diagnosis. nfi nerve fiber indicator. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Correlations between OCT and GDx measurements (MS eyes total). For eyes without ON: rho = 0.57, p < 0.01; eyes with ON: rho = 0.79, p < 0.01
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
OCT and GDx in PP and relapse-onset MS. Eyes without previous ON, adjusted for age and time since diagnosis

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Compston A, Coles A. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2008;372:1502–1517. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61620-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Stefano N, Iannucci G, Sormani MP, et al. MR correlates of cerebral atrophy in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol. 2002;249:1072–1077. doi: 10.1007/s00415-002-0790-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goodin DS. Magnetic resonance imaging as a surrogate outcome measure of disability in multiple sclerosis: have we been overly harsh in our assessment? Ann Neurol. 2006;59:597–605. doi: 10.1002/ana.20832. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reus NJ, Lemij HG. The relationship between standard automated perimetry and GDx VCC measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:840–845. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-0646. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blumenthal EZ, Parikh RS, Pe’er J, et al. Retinal nerve fibre layer imaging compared with histological measurements in a human eye. Eye. 2009;23:171–175. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702942. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms