Measurement of cement thickness under lithium disilicate crowns using an impression material technique
- PMID: 20461424
- DOI: 10.1007/s00784-010-0414-x
Measurement of cement thickness under lithium disilicate crowns using an impression material technique
Abstract
According to the literature, marginal gaps below 120 μm are recommended for conventionally cemented crown restorations. Therefore, the null hypothesis tested was as follows: the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval of the marginal accuracy of chair-side generated lithium disilicate crowns lies below 120 μm. Prior to definite insertion, the accuracy of 20 lithium disilicate crowns (e.max CAD LT) was evaluated by a replica technique. A light-body silicone was used to document the gap between crown and abutment. The thickness of the light-body silicone layer was examined under microscope (MM40, Nikon Corp., Tokyo, Japan; magnification, ×50) at four different landmarks (LM): LM1 = marginal discrepancy, LM2 = mid-axial discrepancy of the inner crown surface, LM3 = axio-occlusal discrepancy, and LM4 = mid-occlusal discrepancy. At LM1, the mean marginal discrepancy revealed 100 μm (SD, ±61 μm); the median was 81 μm. The lower bound of the 95% confidence interval was 90 μm, and the upper bound was 110 μm. The means of internal gaps at LM2, LM3, and LM4 showed 148 μm (SD, ±61 μm), 227 μm (SD, ±83 μm), and 284 μm (SD, ±95 μm), respectively. The lower bounds of the 95% confidence interval revealed values between 137 μm (LM2) and 269 μm (LM4). The upper bounds were between 158 μm (LM2) and 300 μm (LM4). The null hypothesis was not rejected. Within the limits of the study, the chair-side generated lithium disilicate crowns exhibited a sufficient clinical accuracy.
Similar articles
-
Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Oct;112(4):770-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 Jun 28. J Prosthet Dent. 2014. PMID: 24980739 Clinical Trial.
-
Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.J Dent. 2014 Jun;42(6):677-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.01.016. Epub 2014 Feb 6. J Dent. 2014. PMID: 24508541
-
3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.J Prosthodont. 2014 Dec;23(8):610-7. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12180. Epub 2014 Jul 3. J Prosthodont. 2014. PMID: 24995593
-
Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part III: marginal and internal fit.J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Mar;117(3):354-362. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.04.028. Epub 2016 Sep 24. J Prosthet Dent. 2017. PMID: 27677220 Clinical Trial.
-
The marginal fit of E.max Press and E.max CAD lithium disilicate restorations: A critical review.Dent Mater J. 2016 Dec 1;35(6):835-844. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2016-008. Epub 2016 Aug 20. Dent Mater J. 2016. PMID: 27546857 Review.
Cited by
-
Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique.Korean J Orthod. 2014 Mar;44(2):69-76. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2014.44.2.69. Epub 2014 Mar 19. Korean J Orthod. 2014. PMID: 24696823 Free PMC article.
-
Fitting accuracy of zirconia single crowns produced via digital and conventional impressions-a clinical comparative study.Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Mar;21(2):579-587. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1924-y. Epub 2016 Jul 28. Clin Oral Investig. 2017. PMID: 27469102
-
Influence of conventional and digital intraoral impressions on the fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated all-ceramic crowns.Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Dec;20(9):2403-2410. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1714-6. Epub 2016 Jan 23. Clin Oral Investig. 2016. PMID: 26800669
-
Marginal adaptation of lithium disilicate ceramic crowns cemented with three different resin cements.Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Jan;23(1):315-320. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2438-6. Epub 2018 Apr 17. Clin Oral Investig. 2019. PMID: 29663086
-
SEM Evaluation of the Marginal Accuracy of Zirconia, Lithium Disilicate, and Composite Single Crowns Created by CAD/CAM Method: Comparative Analysis of Different Materials.Materials (Basel). 2023 Mar 17;16(6):2413. doi: 10.3390/ma16062413. Materials (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36984293 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous