Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2010 Jun 1;101(7):587-92.
doi: 10.1002/jso.21527.

Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine plus radiotherapy versus gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, and cisplatin followed by radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil for patients with locally advanced, potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine plus radiotherapy versus gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, and cisplatin followed by radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil for patients with locally advanced, potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Jerome Landry et al. J Surg Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: A randomized phase II trial (E1200) was designed to assess toxicities and surgical resection rates in two neoadjuvant gemcitabine-based chemoradiation regimens in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. The trial was terminated early due to poor accrual.

Patients and methods: Patients with borderline resectable adenocarcinomas of the pancreas were enrolled. Arm A patients (n = 10) received gemcitabine 500 mg/m(2) IV weekly for 6 weeks, with radiation to 50.4 Gy followed by surgical resection. Arm B patients (n = 11) received preoperative gemcitabine 175 mg/m(2) on days 1, 5, 29, and 33, cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) on days 1-5 and 29-32, 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) on days 1-5 and 29-32, followed by radiation with continuous infusion 5-FU 225 mg/m(2) for 6 weeks. All patients received adjuvant gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) weekly x 3 for five cycles.

Results: Three patients in arm A, and two patients in arm B were resected. Hematologic toxicity was comparable between the two arms except more patients in arm B developed grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia than those in arm A. Arm B had fewer grade 1-2 GI toxicities although more patients (45%) experienced grade 3-4 GI toxicity.

Conclusions: This phase II trial showed that both regimens were tolerable, and resectability and survival were comparable to previous studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. ECOG 1200 Schema 226×163mm (96 × 96 DPI)
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overall survival by arm for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma 215×279mm (300 × 300 DPI)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Progression-free survival for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma 215×279mm (300 × 300 DPI)

References

    1. Lawrence TS, Eisbruch A, Shewach DS. Gemcitabine-mediated radiosensitization. Semin Oncol. 24(2 Suppl 7):S7-24–S7-28. 1997. - PubMed
    1. Burris HA, 3rd, Moore MJ, Anderson J, et al. Phase I and pharmacologic study of oral topotecan administered twice daily for 21 days to adult patients with solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 15:1087–93. 1997. - PubMed
    1. Rothenberg ML, Benedetti JK, Macdonald JS, et al. Phase II trial of 5-fluorouracil plus eniluracil in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study. Ann Oncol. 2002;13:1576–82. - PubMed
    1. Moossa AR, Lewis MH, Mackie CR. Surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 1979 Jul;54(7):468–74. - PubMed
    1. Regine WF, Winter KA, Abrams RA, et al. Flurouracil vs gemcitabine chemotherapy before and after fluorouracil-based chemoradiation following resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. JAMA. 2008;299:1019–1026. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms