Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Aug;48(8):799-804.
doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.04.003. Epub 2010 Apr 24.

Treatment preference, engagement, and clinical improvement in pharmacotherapy versus psychotherapy for depression

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Treatment preference, engagement, and clinical improvement in pharmacotherapy versus psychotherapy for depression

Bethany M Kwan et al. Behav Res Ther. 2010 Aug.

Abstract

Pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy are generally effective treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD); however, research suggests that patient preferences may influence outcomes. We examined the effects of treatment preference on attrition, therapeutic alliance, and change in depressive severity in a longitudinal randomized clinical trial comparing pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy. Prior to randomization, 106 individuals with MDD reported whether they preferred psychotherapy, antidepressant medication, or had no preference. A mismatch between preferred and actual treatment was associated with greater likelihood of attrition, fewer expected visits attended, and a less positive working alliance at session 2. There was a significant indirect effect of preference match on depression outcomes, primarily via effects of attendance. These findings highlight the importance of addressing patient preferences, particularly in regard to patient engagement, in the treatment of MDD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Failure to start or complete treatment by preference match
Figure 2
Figure 2
Client- and Therapist-rated Session 2 WAI scores by preference match
Figure 3
Figure 3
Changes in depression severity by preference match. Note: Means at each time point were calculated based on the results of multilevel modeling.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Testing indirect effects of preference match on changes in HRSD scores. Paths represented with dashed lines were specified but not significant. Covariances between the preference match codes, between the mediators, and between HRSD slope and intercept were specified but not shown for clarity of presentation. *p < .05, ** p < .01

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Beck AT, Rush AJ, Shaw BF, Emery G. Cognitive therapy for depression. Guilford Press; New York: 1979.
    1. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Manual for the BDI-II. Psychological Corporation; San Antonio, TX: 1996.
    1. Beck JS. Cognitive therapy: Basics and beyond. Guilford Press; New York: 1995.
    1. Byrne N, Regan C, Livingston G. Adherence to treatment in mood disorders. Current Opinion in Psychiatry. 2006;19:44–49. - PubMed
    1. Corrigan PW, Salzer MS. The conflict between random assignment and treatment preference: implications for internal validity. Evaluation and Program Planning. 2003;26:109–121. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances