Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Sep 1;111(1-2):4-12.
doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.03.011. Epub 2010 May 11.

Measuring addiction propensity and severity: the need for a new instrument

Kevin P Conway  1 , Janet Levy, Michael Vanyukov, Redonna Chandler, Joni Rutter, Gary E Swan, Michael Neale
Affiliations
Review

Measuring addiction propensity and severity: the need for a new instrument

Kevin P Conway et al. Drug Alcohol Depend. .

Abstract

Drug addiction research requires but lacks a valid and reliable way to measure both the risk (propensity) to develop addiction and the severity of manifest addiction. This paper argues for a new measurement approach and instrument to quantify propensity to and severity of addiction, based on the testable assumption that these constructs can be mapped onto the same dimension of liability to addiction. The case for this new direction becomes clear from a critical review of empirical data and the current instrumentation. The many assessment instruments in use today have proven utility, reliability, and validity, but they are of limited use for evaluating individual differences in propensity and severity. The conceptual and methodological shortcomings of instruments currently used in research and clinical practice can be overcome through the use of new technologies to develop a reliable, valid, and standardized assessment instrument(s) to measure and distinguish individual variations in expression of the underlying latent trait(s) that comprises propensity to and severity of drug addiction. Such instrumentation would enhance our capacity for drug addiction research on linkages and interactions among familial, genetic, psychosocial, and neurobiological factors associated with variations in propensity and severity. It would lead to new opportunities in substance abuse prevention, treatment, and services research, as well as in interventions and implementation science for drug addiction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Addiction liability distribution
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Adinoff B. Neurobiologic processes in drug reward and addiction. Harvard Review of Psychiatry. 2004;12:305–320. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baillie AJ, Mattick RP. The benzodiazepine dependence questionnaire: Development, reliability and validity. British Journal of Psychiatry. 1996;169:276–281. - PubMed
    1. Bierut LJ, Dinwiddie SH, Begleiter H, Crowe RR, Hesselbrock V, Nurnberger JI, Jr, Porjesz B, Schuckit MA, Reich T. Familial transmission of substance dependence: alcohol, marijuana, cocaine, and habitual smoking: a report from the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55:982–988. - PubMed
    1. Brooner RK, King VL, Kidorf M, Schmidt CW, Jr, Bigelow GE. Psychiatric and substance use comorbidity among treatment-seeking opioid abusers. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997;54:71–80. - PubMed
    1. Button TM, Hewitt JK, Rhee SH, Young SE, Corley RP, Stallings MC. Examination of the causes of covariation between conduct disorder symptoms and vulnerability to drug dependence. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2006;9:38–45. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms