Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Nov-Dec;16(6):651-74.
doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmq009. Epub 2010 May 12.

Peripheral biomarkers of endometriosis: a systematic review

Affiliations

Peripheral biomarkers of endometriosis: a systematic review

K E May et al. Hum Reprod Update. 2010 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Background: Endometriosis is estimated to affect 1 in 10 women during the reproductive years. There is often delay in making the diagnosis, mainly due to the non-specific nature of the associated symptoms and the need to verify the disease surgically. A biomarker that is simple to measure could help clinicians to diagnose (or at least exclude) endometriosis; it might also allow the effects of treatment to be monitored. If effective, such a marker or panel of markers could prevent unnecessary diagnostic procedures and/or recognize treatment failure at an early stage.

Methods: We used QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) criteria to perform a systematic review of the literature over the last 25 years to assess critically the clinical value of all proposed biomarkers for endometriosis in serum, plasma and urine.

Results: We identified over 100 putative biomarkers in publications that met the selection criteria. We were unable to identify a single biomarker or panel of biomarkers that have unequivocally been shown to be clinically useful.

Conclusions: Peripheral biomarkers show promise as diagnostic aids, but further research is necessary before they can be recommended in routine clinical care. Panels of markers may allow increased sensitivity and specificity of any diagnostic test.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram depicting selection of articles for review.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Spider diagram depicting putative biomarkers.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abrao MS, Podgaec S, Filho BM, Ramos LO, Pinotti JA, de Oliveira RM. The use of biochemical markers in the diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:2523–2527. doi:10.1093/humrep/12.11.2523. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abrao MS, Podgaec S, Pinotti JA, de Oliveira RM. Tumor markers in endometriosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1999;66:19–22. doi:10.1016/S0020-7292(99)00046-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Acien P, Lloret M, Graells M. Prolactin and its response to the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone thyrotropin-releasing hormone test in patients with endometriosis before, during, and after treatment with danazol. Fertil Steril. 1989;51:774–780. - PubMed
    1. Adamyan LV, Fanchenko ND, Alexeyeva ML, Andreyeva YN, Novikov YA, Jahan I. Hormonal and immunologic methods in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with benign ovarian tumors and endometriotic cysts. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud. 1993;38:92–98. - PubMed
    1. Agic A, Xu H, Rehbein M, Wolfler M, Ebert A, Hornung D. Cognate chemokine receptor 1 messenger ribonucleic acid expression in peripheral blood as a diagnostic test for endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:982–984. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.09.012. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms