Internal versus external tocodynamometry in labor

Comment

Konstantinos P Economopoulos et al. N Engl J Med. 2010.

. 2010 May 13;362(19):1842; author reply 1842-3.

doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1002224.

No abstract available

Comment on

Outcomes after internal versus external tocodynamometry for monitoring labor.
Bakker JJ, Verhoeven CJ, Janssen PF, van Lith JM, van Oudgaarden ED, Bloemenkamp KW, Papatsonis DN, Mol BW, van der Post JA. Bakker JJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jan 28;362(4):306-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0902748. N Engl J Med. 2010. PMID: 20107216 Clinical Trial.

Outcomes after internal versus external tocodynamometry for monitoring labor.
Bakker JJ, Verhoeven CJ, Janssen PF, van Lith JM, van Oudgaarden ED, Bloemenkamp KW, Papatsonis DN, Mol BW, van der Post JA. Bakker JJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jan 28;362(4):306-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0902748. N Engl J Med. 2010. PMID: 20107216 Clinical Trial.
[Limits of detection, undesirable side-effects, and impact on labor outcome of the use of fetal electronic monitoring and tocography].
Thoulon JM. Thoulon JM. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1994;23(5):486-91. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1994. PMID: 7983307 Review. French. No abstract available.
[Evolution of indications for cesarean section between 1991 and 2000 in materials from the Pathology Clinic in the Department of Pregnancy and Labor, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin].
Bilar M. Bilar M. Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2003;49:173-92. Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2003. PMID: 15552847 Polish.
Pregnancy after bariatric surgery is not associated with adverse perinatal outcome.
Sheiner E, Levy A, Silverberg D, Menes TS, Levy I, Katz M, Mazor M. Sheiner E, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 May;190(5):1335-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.11.004. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 15167839
Advanced maternal age. Part I: obstetric complications.
Usta IM, Nassar AH. Usta IM, et al. Am J Perinatol. 2008 Sep;25(8):521-34. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1085620. Epub 2008 Sep 4. Am J Perinatol. 2008. PMID: 18773378 Review.