Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Dec;42(4):903-7.
doi: 10.1007/s11255-010-9739-2. Epub 2010 May 13.

Evaluation of video-urodynamic studies before renal transplantation in chronic renal failure patients

Affiliations

Evaluation of video-urodynamic studies before renal transplantation in chronic renal failure patients

Tahsin Turunc et al. Int Urol Nephrol. 2010 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the role of video-urodynamic examination prior to renal transplantation.

Methods: Sixty-four kidney transplant recipients were included into the study. All patients underwent video-urodynamic examination and separate uroflowmetry. Results were evaluated based on daily mean amount of urine, duration of chronic renal failure and presence of diabetes mellitus.

Results: Thirty-five (54.6%) patients showed video-urodynamic abnormalities. The mean detrusor capacity was 234 ml, the mean detrusor compliance was 17.5 cm H(2)O/ml, the mean maximum detrusor pressure was 61.9 cm H(2)O and the mean Q (max) was 13.8 ml/s in all patients. Vesicoureteral reflux was detected in 15 (23%) patients. The mean detrusor compliance and detrusor capacity significantly decreased as the daily amount of urine decreased and as the duration of chronic renal failure increased. Also, there was no significant relation between presence of diabetes mellitus and detrusor capacity and detrusor compliance.

Conclusion: Video-urodynamic studies before renal transplantation provide earlier diagnosis of lower tract abnormalities, which are likely to cause graft dysfunction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. BJU Int. 2008 Apr;101(8):1029-34 - PubMed
    1. Int Urol Nephrol. 2011 Mar;43(1):215-24 - PubMed
    1. Transplant Proc. 2003 Sep;35(6):2174-5 - PubMed
    1. Urology. 2002 Nov;60(5):770-4 - PubMed
    1. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2003;37(4):335-8 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources