Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Spring;21(1):58-71.

Reasoning in the capacity to make medical decisions: the consideration of values

Affiliations

Reasoning in the capacity to make medical decisions: the consideration of values

Michele J Karel et al. J Clin Ethics. 2010 Spring.

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the contribution of "values-based reasoning" in evaluating older adults' capacity to make medical decisions.

Design and methods: Older men with schizophrenia (n=20) or dementia (n=20), and a primary care comparison group (n=19), completed cognitive and psychiatric screening and an interview to determine their capacity to make medical decisions, which included a component on values. All of the participants were receiving treatment at Veterans Administration (VA) outpatient clinics.

Results: Participants varied widely in the activities and relationships they most valued, the extent to which religious beliefs would influence healthcare decisions, and in ratings of the importance of preserving quality versus length of life. Most participants preferred shared decision making with doctor, family, or both. Individuals with schizophrenia or dementia performed worse than a primary care comparison group in reasoning measured by the ability to list risks and benefits and compare choices. Individuals with dementia performed comparably to the primary care group in reasoning measured by the ability to justify choices in terms of valued abilities or activities, whereas individuals with schizophrenia performed relatively worse compared to the other two groups. Compared to primary care patients, participants with schizophrenia and with dementia were impaired on the ability to explain treatment choices in terms of valued relationships.

Conclusion: Medical decision making may be influenced by strongly held values and beliefs, emotions, and long life experience. To date, these issues have not been explicitly included in structured evaluations of medical decision-making capacity. This study demonstrated that it is possible to inquire of and elicit a range of healthcare related values and preferences from older adults with dementia or schizophrenia, and individuals with mild to moderate dementia may be able to discuss healthcare options in relation to their values. However, how best to incorporate a values assessment into a structured capacity evaluation deserves further research attention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Appelbaum PS, Grisso T. Assessing Patients’ Capacities to Consent to Treatment. New England Journal of Medicine. 1988;319:1635–8. - PubMed
    2. Roth LH, Meisel CA, Lidz CA. Tests of Competency to Consent to Treatment. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 1977;134:279–84. - PubMed
    3. Tepper A, Elwork A. Competency to Consent to Treatment as a Psycholegal Construct. Law and Human Behavior. 1984;8:205–23. - PubMed
    1. Kitamura T, Kitamura F. Reliability of Clinical Judgment of Patients’ Competency to Give Informed Consent: A Case Vignette Study. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. 2000;54:245–7. - PubMed
    2. Marson DC, et al. Consistency of Physician Judgments of Capacity to Consent in Mild Alzheimer’s Disease. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1997;45:453–7. - PubMed
    1. Moye J, et al. Empirical Advances in the Assessment of the Capacity to Consent to Medical Treatment: Clinical Implications and Research Needs. Clinical Psychology Review. 2006;26:1054–77. - PubMed
    1. Moye J, Karel MJ, Azar AR, Gurrera RJ. Hopes and Cautions for Instrument-Based Evaluations of Consent Capacity: Results of a Construct Validity Study of Three Instruments. Ethics, Law, and Aging Review. 2004;10:39–61. - PMC - PubMed
    2. Moye J, Karel MJ, Azar AR, Gurrera RJ. Capacity to Consent to Treatment: Empirical Comparison of Three Instruments in Older Adults with and without Dementia. Gerontologist. 2004;44:166–75. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Evans JSBT. Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology. 2008;59:255–78. - PubMed
    2. Redelmeier DA, Rozin P, Kahneman D. Understanding Patients’ Decisions: Cognitive and Emotional Perspectives. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1993;270:72–6. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources