Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun;25(6):584-92.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1262-8.

A nationwide survey of patient centered medical home demonstration projects

Affiliations

A nationwide survey of patient centered medical home demonstration projects

Asaf Bitton et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The patient centered medical home has received considerable attention as a potential way to improve primary care quality and limit cost growth. Little information exists that systematically compares PCMH pilot projects across the country.

Design: Cross-sectional key-informant interviews.

Participants: Leaders from existing PCMH demonstration projects with external payment reform.

Measurements: We used a semi-structured interview tool with the following domains: project history, organization and participants, practice requirements and selection process, medical home recognition, payment structure, practice transformation, and evaluation design.

Results: A total of 26 demonstrations in 18 states were interviewed. Current demonstrations include over 14,000 physicians caring for nearly 5 million patients. A majority of demonstrations are single payer, and most utilize a three component payment model (traditional fee for service, per person per month fixed payments, and bonus performance payments). The median incremental revenue per physician per year was $22,834 (range $720 to $91,146). Two major practice transformation models were identified--consultative and implementation of the chronic care model. A majority of demonstrations did not have well-developed evaluation plans.

Conclusion: Current PCMH demonstration projects with external payment reform include large numbers of patients and physicians as well as a wide spectrum of implementation models. Key questions exist around the adequacy of current payment mechanisms and evaluation plans as public and policy interest in the PCMH model grows.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selection of participants for the study.

References

    1. Bodenheimer T, Grumbach K, Berenson RA. A lifeline for primary care. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(26):2693–2696. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0902909. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hauer KE, et al. Factors associated with medical students’ career choices regarding internal medicine. Jama. 2008;300(10):1154–1164. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.10.1154. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lipner RS, et al. Who is maintaining certification in internal medicine–and why? A national survey 10 years after initial certification. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(1):29–36. - PubMed
    1. McGlynn EA, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(26):2635–2645. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa022615. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ginsburg JA, et al. Achieving a high-performance health care system with universal access: what the United States can learn from other countries. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(1):55–75. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms