Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul;153B(5):1081-93.
doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.31079.

Perception, experience, and response to genetic discrimination in Huntington disease: the international RESPOND-HD study

Collaborators, Affiliations

Perception, experience, and response to genetic discrimination in Huntington disease: the international RESPOND-HD study

Cheryl Erwin et al. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2010 Jul.

Abstract

Genetic discrimination-defined as the denial of rights, privileges, or opportunities or other adverse treatment based solely on genetic information (including family history)-is an important concern to patients, healthcare professionals, lawmakers, and family members at risk for carrying a deleterious gene. Data from the United States, Canada, and Australia were collected from 433 individuals at risk for Huntington disease (HD) who have tested either positive or negative for the gene that causes HD and family members of affected individuals who have a 50% risk for developing the disorder but remain untested. Across all three countries, a total of 46.2% of respondents report genetic discrimination or stigma based on either their family history of HD or genetic testing for the HD gene mutation. We report on the overall incidence of discrimination and stigma in the domains of insurance (25.9%), employment (6.5%), relationships (32.9%), and other transactions (4.6%) in the United States, Canada, and Australia combined. The incidence of self-reported discrimination is less than the overall worry about the risk of discrimination, which is more prevalent in each domain. Despite a relatively low rate of perceived genetic discrimination in the areas of health insurance and employment, compared to the perception of discrimination and stigma in personal relationships, the cumulative burden of genetic discrimination across all domains of experience represents a challenge to those at risk for HD. The effect of this cumulative burden on daily life decisions remains unknown.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Apse KA, Biesecker BB, Giardiello FM, Fuller BP, Bernhardt BA. Perceptions of genetic discrimination among at-risk relatives of colorectal cancer patients. Genet Med. 2004;6(6):510–516. - PubMed
    1. Beck AT. Beck Hopelessness Scale. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt; 1993.
    1. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Beck Depression Inventory-II: Manual. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt; 1996.
    1. Benton AL, Hamsher KdS. Multilingual Aphasia Examination. Iowa City: University of Iowa; 1978.
    1. Billings PR, Kohn MA, de Cuevas M, Beckwith J, Alper JS, Natowicz MR. Discrimination as a consequence of genetic testing. Am J Hum Genet. 1992;50(3):476–482. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types