Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun;19(6):1195-200.
doi: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1623.

Race/Ethnicity and pregnancy decision making: the role of fatalism and subjective social standing

Affiliations

Race/Ethnicity and pregnancy decision making: the role of fatalism and subjective social standing

Allison S Bryant et al. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: Rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States differ by race and ethnicity. We examined whether these differences might be explained by maternal fatalism and subjective social standing.

Methods: We used data from 1070 pregnant women of sociodemographically diverse backgrounds enrolled in prenatal care in the San Francisco Bay area. Logistic regression was used to explore the relationship between attitude variables and a measure of pregnancy decision making ("not trying to get pregnant").

Results: African American women were more likely than others to report not trying to get pregnant with the current pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.04, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.22-3.43, p = 0.007). Higher subjective social standing was associated with a lower likelihood of not trying among white and U.S.-born women only (AOR 0.67, p = 0.001 and AOR 0.75, p < 0.001, respectively. Fatalism was associated with not trying in bivariate but not multivariable analyses.

Conclusions: In this population, the likelihood of reporting not trying to get pregnant was higher among racial/ethnic minorities regardless of subjective social standing. Programs aimed at reduction in unintended pregnancy rates need to be targeted to a broader population of women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Finer L. Henshaw S. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006;38:90–96. - PubMed
    1. IOM. The best intentions: Unintended pregnancy and the well-being of children and families. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1995. - PubMed
    1. Cubbin C. Braveman PA. Marchi KS. Chavez GF. Santelli JS. Gilbert BJ. Socioeconomic and racial/ethnic disparities in unintended pregnancy among postpartum women in California. Matern Child Health J. 2002;6:237–246. - PubMed
    1. Henshaw SK. Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998;30:24–29. 46. - PubMed
    1. Pulley L. Klerman LV. Tang H. Baker BA. The extent of pregnancy mistiming and its association with maternal characteristics and behaviors and pregnancy outcomes. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2002;34:206–211. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources