Correcting abnormal flexion-relaxation in chronic lumbar pain: responsiveness to a new biofeedback training protocol
- PMID: 20473047
- PMCID: PMC2908528
- DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181d2bd8c
Correcting abnormal flexion-relaxation in chronic lumbar pain: responsiveness to a new biofeedback training protocol
Abstract
Objectives: Lumbar flexion-relaxation is a well-known phenomenon that can reliably be seen in normal participants, but not in most chronic low back pain (CLBP) participants. No earlier studies have investigated any specific clinical intervention designed to correct abnormal flexion-relaxation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the contribution of a surface EMG-assisted stretching (SEMGAS) biofeedback training protocol, within a functional restoration treatment program, on flexion range of motion (ROM) and erector spinae surface EMG (SEMG) during maximum voluntary flexion (MVF).
Methods: Lumbar flexion ROM and MVF SEMG were assessed in 2 groups of CLBP patients at the beginning and end of rehabilitation. One group participated in functional restoration only, whereas the other group participated in functional restoration plus SEMGAS biofeedback training. Both treatment groups were compared with a separate control group of normal, pain-free participants.
Results: Pretreatment ROM and MVF SEMG measures were similar in both treatment groups, but were very different than the control group. At posttreatment, the functional restoration only group remained statistically different than the control group on MVF SEMG and some ROM measures, but the SEMGAS group was statistically equivalent to the control participants on all posttreatment measures, including the ability to show flexion-relaxation.
Discussion: Interdisciplinary functional restoration rehabilitation of CLBP participants is effective for increasing ROM and other functional measures, but the addition of a SEMGAS biofeedback training protocol can result in normalization of the flexion-relaxation phenomenon, so that these participants are comparable with a pain-free control group.
References
-
- Triano JJ, Schultz AB. Correlation of objective measure of trunk motion and muscle function with low back disability ratings. SPINE. 1987;12:561–5. - PubMed
-
- Ahern D, Follick M, Council J, et al. Comparison of lumbar paravertebral EMG patterns in chronic low back pain patients and non-patient controls. Pain. 1988;34:153–60. - PubMed
-
- Sihvonen T, Partanen J, Hänninen O, et al. Electric behavior of low back muscles during lumbar pelvic rhythm in low back pain patients and healthy controls. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991;72:1080–7. - PubMed
-
- Shirado O, Ito T, Kaneda K, et al. Flexion-relaxation phenomenon in the back muscles: A comparative study between healthy subjects and patients with chronic low back pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;74:139–44. - PubMed
-
- Watson P, Booker CK, Main CJ, et al. Surface electromyography in the identification of chronic low back pain patients: The development of the flexion relaxation ratio. Clin Biomech. 1997a;2:165–71. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources