Integration and use of biomarkers in drug development, regulation and clinical practice: a US regulatory perspective
- PMID: 20477416
- DOI: 10.2217/17520363.2.3.305
Integration and use of biomarkers in drug development, regulation and clinical practice: a US regulatory perspective
Abstract
The US FDA encourages the integration of biomarkers in drug development and their appropriate use in clinical practice. It is believed that this approach will help alleviate stagnation and foster innovation in the development of new medical products, and, ultimately, lead to more personalized medicine. To facilitate the use of biomarkers in drug development and clinical practice, the FDA organized workshops, issued guidances, established a voluntary submission process, developed online educational tools and, most importantly, strives to ensure the integration of this information into drug labels, for example, via the update of existing labels, or the inclusion of appropriate language in new drug labels. A pilot process has been set up to qualify novel biomarkers that are not associated with specific drug products, but are of more common use (e.g., biomarkers for drug safety). In addition, the FDA has initiated the creation of various consortia that are working towards the identification and characterization of exploratory biomarkers in order to qualify them for a specific use.
Similar articles
-
Food and Drug Administration requirements for testing and approval of new radiopharmaceuticals.Semin Nucl Med. 2010 Sep;40(5):364-84. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2010.05.002. Semin Nucl Med. 2010. PMID: 20674596 Review.
-
Molecular biomarkers: a US FDA effort.Biomark Med. 2010 Apr;4(2):215-25. doi: 10.2217/bmm.09.81. Biomark Med. 2010. PMID: 20406066 Review.
-
Grand rounds in proteomics at the FDA white oak, silver spring, MD, USA, april 3, 2007.Proteomics Clin Appl. 2007 Dec;1(12):1526-31. doi: 10.1002/prca.200700575. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2007. PMID: 21136652
-
Qualifying biomarkers for use in drug development: a US Food and Drug Administration overview.Expert Opin Med Diagn. 2011 Sep;5(5):369-74. doi: 10.1517/17530059.2011.588947. Expert Opin Med Diagn. 2011. PMID: 23484625
-
Paving the critical path: how can clinical pharmacology help achieve the vision?Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Feb;81(2):170-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100045. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007. PMID: 17259944 Review.
Cited by
-
A pilot study to evaluate the application of a generic protein standard panel for quality control of biomarker detection technologies.BMC Res Notes. 2011 Aug 11;4:281. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-281. BMC Res Notes. 2011. PMID: 21834984 Free PMC article.
-
A non-invasive diagnostic model of immunoglobulin A nephropathy and serological markers for evaluating disease severity.Chin Med J (Engl). 2019 Mar 20;132(6):647-652. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000121. Chin Med J (Engl). 2019. PMID: 30855344 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of molecular and genomic biomarkers of retinal drug efficacy: use of ocular fluid sampling to evaluate VEGF.Neurochem Res. 2011 Apr;36(4):655-67. doi: 10.1007/s11064-010-0328-7. Epub 2010 Dec 7. Neurochem Res. 2011. PMID: 21136159
-
OARSI Clinical Trials Recommendations: Soluble biomarker assessments in clinical trials in osteoarthritis.Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 May;23(5):686-97. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.03.002. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015. PMID: 25952342 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Imperfect gold standards for kidney injury biomarker evaluation.J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Jan;23(1):13-21. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2010111124. Epub 2011 Oct 21. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012. PMID: 22021710 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources