Economic impacts of policies affecting crop biotechnology and trade
- PMID: 20478422
- DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2010.05.012
Economic impacts of policies affecting crop biotechnology and trade
Abstract
Agricultural biotechnologies, and especially transgenic crops, have the potential to boost food security in developing countries by offering higher incomes for farmers and lower priced and better quality food for consumers. That potential is being heavily compromised, however, because the European Union and some other countries have implemented strict regulatory systems to govern their production and consumption of genetically modified (GM) food and feed crops, and to prevent imports of foods and feedstuffs that do not meet these strict standards. This paper analyses empirically the potential economic effects of adopting transgenic crops in Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. It does so using a multi-country, multi-product model of the global economy. The results suggest the economic welfare gains from crop biotechnology adoption are potentially very large, and that those benefits are diminished only very slightly by the presence of the European Union's restriction on imports of GM foods. That is, if developing countries retain bans on GM crop production in an attempt to maintain access to EU markets for non-GM products, the loss to their food consumers as well as to farmers in those developing countries is huge relative to the slight loss that could be incurred from not retaining EU market access.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Trade and commerce in improved crops and food: an essay on food security.N Biotechnol. 2010 Nov 30;27(5):623-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2010.06.009. Epub 2010 Jun 25. N Biotechnol. 2010. PMID: 20601266 Review.
-
Economic impact of transgenic crops in developing countries.Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2006 Apr;17(2):174-8. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2006.02.009. Epub 2006 Mar 7. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2006. PMID: 16522366 Review.
-
The costly benefits of opposing agricultural biotechnology.N Biotechnol. 2010 Nov 30;27(5):635-40. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2010.05.006. Epub 2010 May 22. N Biotechnol. 2010. PMID: 20472105 Review.
-
An Asian perspective on GMO and biotechnology issues.Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2008;17 Suppl 1:237-40. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2008. PMID: 18296345 Review.
-
Incomplete coexistence systems and international food trade impacts.Transgenic Res. 2015 Dec;24(6):1003-16. doi: 10.1007/s11248-015-9900-x. Epub 2015 Aug 7. Transgenic Res. 2015. PMID: 26249847
Cited by
-
Genetically Modified Labeling Policies: Moving Forward or Backward?Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018 Nov 27;6:181. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00181. eCollection 2018. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018. PMID: 30538985 Free PMC article. Review.
-
DNA barcoding simplifies environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops in biodiverse regions.PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e35929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035929. Epub 2012 May 2. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22567120 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources