Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul;184(1):213-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.008. Epub 2010 May 15.

Bladder management after spinal cord injury in the United States 1972 to 2005

Affiliations

Bladder management after spinal cord injury in the United States 1972 to 2005

Anne P Cameron et al. J Urol. 2010 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: Studies have shown that bladder management with an indwelling catheter for patients with spinal cord injury is associated with more urological complications such as stones, urinary infection, urethral strictures and bladder cancer. However, little is known about actual bladder management for these patients in clinical practice.

Materials and methods: Using the National Spinal Cord Injury Database the bladder management method was determined at discharge from rehabilitation and at each 5-year followup period for 30 years.

Results: At discharge from rehabilitation (24,762 patients) the selection of bladder management with a condom catheter decreased steadily from a peak of 34.6% in 1972 to a low of 1.50% in 2001. The use of clean intermittent catheterization increased from 12.6% in 1972 to a peak of 56.2% in 1991. Indwelling catheter use initially decreased from 33.1% in 1972 to 16.5% in 1991 but increased to 23.1% in 2001. Of 12,984 individuals with followup data those originally using an indwelling catheter for bladder management were unlikely to switch to another method, with 71.1% continuing to use an indwelling catheter at 30 years. Individuals using clean intermittent catheterization and condom catheterization at discharge home did not continue to use these methods with only 20% and 34.6% remaining on the same management, respectively.

Conclusions: With time bladder management with clean intermittent catheterization has increased in popularity. However, only 20% of patients initially on clean intermittent catheterization remained on this form of bladder management. More research on the safety of each of these methods needs to be performed to provide better guidance to aid with this decision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms