Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul 30;178(2):299-304.
doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.11.024. Epub 2010 May 15.

Relationship between impulsivity and decision making in cocaine dependence

Affiliations

Relationship between impulsivity and decision making in cocaine dependence

Kimberly L Kjome et al. Psychiatry Res. .

Abstract

Impulsivity and decision making are associated on a theoretical level in that impaired planning is a component of both. However, few studies have examined the relationship between measures of decision making and impulsivity in clinical populations. The purpose of this study was to compare cocaine-dependent subjects to controls on a measure of decision making (the Iowa Gambling Task or IGT), a questionnaire measure of impulsivity (the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale or BIS-11) and a measure of behavioural inhibition (the immediate memory task or IMT), and to examine the interrelationship among these measures. Results of the study showed that cocaine-dependent subjects made more disadvantageous choices on the IGT, had higher scores on the BIS and more commission errors on the IMT. Cognitive model analysis showed that choice consistency factors on the IGT differed between cocaine-dependent subjects and controls. However, there was no significant correlation between IGT performance and the BIS total score or subscales or IMT commission errors. These results suggest that in cocaine-dependent subjects there is little overlap between decision making as measured by the IGT and impulsivity/behavioural inhibition as measured by the BIS and IMT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Iowa Gambling Task Results by Group. Zero line on Y-axis denotes no preference for advantageous vs. disadvantageous decks.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ainslie GW. Impulse control in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 1974;21(3):485–489. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allen TJ, Moeller FG, Rhoades HM, Cherek DR. Impulsivity and history of drug dependence. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 1998;50 (2):137–145. - PubMed
    1. Barratt ES. Impulsivity: integrating cognitive, behavioral, biological, and environmental data. In: McCown WGJJ, Shure MB, editors. The Impulsive Client. American Psychological Association; Washington, DC: 1993. pp. 39–53.
    1. Beale IL, Matthew PJ, Oliver S, Corballis MC. Performance of disabled and normal readers on the Continuous Performance Test. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 1987;15 (2):229–238. - PubMed
    1. Bechara A, Damasio AR, Damasio H, Anderson SW. Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition. 1994;50 (1–3):7–15. - PubMed

Publication types