Comparative Study
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.04.028.
Epub 2010 May 8.
Original Gleason system versus 2005 ISUP modified Gleason system: the importance of indicating which system is used in the patient's pathology and clinical reports
- PMID: 20478652
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.04.028
Item in Clipboard
Comparative Study
Original Gleason system versus 2005 ISUP modified Gleason system: the importance of indicating which system is used in the patient's pathology and clinical reports
Eur Urol.
2010 Sep.
No abstract available
Comment in
-
Re: Rodolfo Montironi, Liang Cheng, Antonio Lopez-Beltran, et al. Original Gleason system versus 2005 ISUP modified Gleason system: the importance of indicating which system is used in the patient's pathology and clinical reports. Eur Urol 2010;58:369-73.Eur Urol. 2011 Mar;59(3):e5-6; author reply e7-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.11.029. Epub 2010 Dec 1. Eur Urol. 2011. PMID: 21134713 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Re: Rodolfo Montironi, Liang Cheng, Antonio Lopez-Beltran, et al. Original Gleason system versus 2005 ISUP modified Gleason system: the importance of indicating which system is used in the patient's pathology and clinical reports. Eur Urol 2010;58:369-73.Eur Urol. 2011 Mar;59(3):e5-6; author reply e7-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.11.029. Epub 2010 Dec 1. Eur Urol. 2011. PMID: 21134713 No abstract available.
-
The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus on Gleason grading in contemporary practice.Histopathology. 2009 Oct;55(4):384-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03405.x. Histopathology. 2009. PMID: 19817888
-
Prediction of pelvic lymph node metastasis by the ratio of cathepsin B to stefin A in patients with prostate carcinoma.Cancer. 2002 Jun 15;94(12):3141-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10604. Cancer. 2002. PMID: 12115346
-
[Discrepancies between Japanese general rules of prostatic cancer and Gleason grading system].Nihon Rinsho. 2000 Jul;58 Suppl:413-5. Nihon Rinsho. 2000. PMID: 11022759 Review. Japanese. No abstract available.
-
Update on the Gleason grading system for prostate cancer: results of an international consensus conference of urologic pathologists.Adv Anat Pathol. 2006 Jan;13(1):57-9. doi: 10.1097/01.pap.0000202017.78917.18. Adv Anat Pathol. 2006. PMID: 16462155
Cited by
-
Gleason grade progression is uncommon.Cancer Res. 2013 Aug 15;73(16):5163-8. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0427. Cancer Res. 2013. PMID: 23946472 Free PMC article.
-
Clinicopathologic features of incidental prostatic adenocarcinoma in radical cystoprostatectomy specimens.World J Surg Oncol. 2011 Jul 20;9:81. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-9-81. World J Surg Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21774802 Free PMC article.
-
Significant association between the Axin2 rs2240308 single nucleotide polymorphism and the incidence of prostate cancer.Oncol Lett. 2014 Aug;8(2):789-794. doi: 10.3892/ol.2014.2177. Epub 2014 May 26. Oncol Lett. 2014. PMID: 25013500 Free PMC article.
-
Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: A Grading from Gleason to the New Grade-Group System: A Historical and Critical Review.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Mar 26;20(3):661-666. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.3.661. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019. PMID: 30909661 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Active surveillance for prostate and thyroid cancers: evolution in clinical paradigms and lessons learned.Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019 Mar;16(3):168-184. doi: 10.1038/s41571-018-0116-x. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30413793 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
