Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 May;136(5):432-8.
doi: 10.1001/archoto.2010.57.

Case-control analysis of cochlear implant performance in elderly patients

Affiliations

Case-control analysis of cochlear implant performance in elderly patients

David R Friedland et al. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 May.

Abstract

Objective: To characterize speech perception performance in elderly cochlear implant users compared with younger adult users.

Design: Case-control retrospective analysis from January 1, 1999, to January 28, 2008.

Setting: Tertiary care, academic practice cochlear implant program.

Patients: Medical records for 78 patients with age at implantation of 65 years or older were analyzed for ear-specific preimplantation speech perception performance, length of deafness, age at implantation, and 1-year postimplantation speech perception performance. A subset of 28 elderly patients with complete data was matched to 28 younger adult patients (age at implantation, 18-64 years) for preimplantation performance using the Hearing in Noise Test-Quiet scores (mean, 22% and 23%, respectively).

Main outcome measure: One-year postimplantation performance on word and sentence testing.

Results: Within the elderly cohort, the Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant and Hearing in Noise Test-Quiet scores were not affected by age. The Hearing in Noise Test-Noise scores trended downward with increasing age but did not reach statistical significance (P = .052). Of the matched older and younger patients, 55 of 56 showed improvement in their 1-year postimplantation compared with preimplantation Hearing in Noise Test-Quiet scores, with better preimplantation performance predictive of better postimplantation performance, independent of age at implantation (P = .02). Group comparisons, however, revealed poorer postimplantation scores overall for the elderly patients compared with the younger ones for the Hearing in Noise Test-Quiet (70% vs 83%; P = .02) and the Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant test (38% vs 53%; P = .02).

Conclusions: Elderly patients benefit significantly from cochlear implantation. Compared with a younger cohort matched for preimplantation performance, however, their postimplantation scores are significantly lower on some measures. These results may provide guidelines for candidacy and counseling regarding elderly patients with cochlear implants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Longitudinal aspect of case-control analysis.
    Vogtmann E, Prentice H, Griffin R, Mishra S, McGwin G Jr. Vogtmann E, et al. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Nov;136(11):1150; author reply 1150. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2010.176. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010. PMID: 21079176 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types