Case-control analysis of cochlear implant performance in elderly patients
- PMID: 20479370
- DOI: 10.1001/archoto.2010.57
Case-control analysis of cochlear implant performance in elderly patients
Abstract
Objective: To characterize speech perception performance in elderly cochlear implant users compared with younger adult users.
Design: Case-control retrospective analysis from January 1, 1999, to January 28, 2008.
Setting: Tertiary care, academic practice cochlear implant program.
Patients: Medical records for 78 patients with age at implantation of 65 years or older were analyzed for ear-specific preimplantation speech perception performance, length of deafness, age at implantation, and 1-year postimplantation speech perception performance. A subset of 28 elderly patients with complete data was matched to 28 younger adult patients (age at implantation, 18-64 years) for preimplantation performance using the Hearing in Noise Test-Quiet scores (mean, 22% and 23%, respectively).
Main outcome measure: One-year postimplantation performance on word and sentence testing.
Results: Within the elderly cohort, the Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant and Hearing in Noise Test-Quiet scores were not affected by age. The Hearing in Noise Test-Noise scores trended downward with increasing age but did not reach statistical significance (P = .052). Of the matched older and younger patients, 55 of 56 showed improvement in their 1-year postimplantation compared with preimplantation Hearing in Noise Test-Quiet scores, with better preimplantation performance predictive of better postimplantation performance, independent of age at implantation (P = .02). Group comparisons, however, revealed poorer postimplantation scores overall for the elderly patients compared with the younger ones for the Hearing in Noise Test-Quiet (70% vs 83%; P = .02) and the Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant test (38% vs 53%; P = .02).
Conclusions: Elderly patients benefit significantly from cochlear implantation. Compared with a younger cohort matched for preimplantation performance, however, their postimplantation scores are significantly lower on some measures. These results may provide guidelines for candidacy and counseling regarding elderly patients with cochlear implants.
Comment in
-
Longitudinal aspect of case-control analysis.Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Nov;136(11):1150; author reply 1150. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2010.176. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010. PMID: 21079176 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Cochlear implantation in the octogenarian and nonagenarian.Otol Neurotol. 2010 Oct;31(8):1343-9. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181edb69d. Otol Neurotol. 2010. PMID: 20729782
-
The effects of cochlear implantation on speech perception in older adults.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Mar;59(3):446-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03310.x. Epub 2011 Mar 1. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011. PMID: 21361884
-
Performance of older adult cochlear implant users in Hong Kong.Ear Hear. 2007 Apr;28(2 Suppl):52S-55S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318031509d. Ear Hear. 2007. PMID: 17496647
-
[Cochlear implants in elderly: performance outcomes in the long term].Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2011;132(4-5):187-91. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2011. PMID: 22908538 French.
-
Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Apr;49(2):338-51. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/027). J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006. PMID: 16671848
Cited by
-
Residual Cochlear Function in Adults and Children Receiving Cochlear Implants: Correlations With Speech Perception Outcomes.Ear Hear. 2019 May/Jun;40(3):577-591. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000630. Ear Hear. 2019. PMID: 30169463 Free PMC article.
-
SEDA: A tunable Q-factor wavelet-based noise reduction algorithm for multi-talker babble.Speech Commun. 2018 Feb;96:102-115. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2017.11.004. Epub 2017 Nov 9. Speech Commun. 2018. PMID: 29606781 Free PMC article.
-
[Factors influencing the outcome of cochlear implantation: what role is played by secondary and post-secondary education? German version].HNO. 2025 Sep;73(9):650-660. doi: 10.1007/s00106-025-01646-9. Epub 2025 Jul 31. HNO. 2025. PMID: 40745484 Free PMC article. German.
-
Electrode Location and Angular Insertion Depth Are Predictors of Audiologic Outcomes in Cochlear Implantation.Otol Neurotol. 2016 Sep;37(8):1016-23. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001125. Otol Neurotol. 2016. PMID: 27348391 Free PMC article.
-
Cochlear Implantation in US Military Veterans: A Single Institution Study.OTO Open. 2023 May 12;7(2):e53. doi: 10.1002/oto2.53. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun. OTO Open. 2023. PMID: 37187572 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical