Ease of use and patient preference injection simulation study comparing two prefilled insulin pens
- PMID: 20482243
- DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2010.489028
Ease of use and patient preference injection simulation study comparing two prefilled insulin pens
Abstract
Objectives: To determine patient ease of use and preference for the Humalog KwikPen* (prefilled insulin lispro [Humalog dagger] pen, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA) (insulin lispro pen) versus the Next Generation FlexPen double dagger (prefilled insulin aspart [NovoRapid section sign ] pen, Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) (insulin aspart pen).
Research design and methods: This was a randomized, open-label, 2-period, 8-sequence crossover study in insulin pen-naïve patients with diabetes. Randomized patients (N = 367) received device training, then simulated low- (15 U) and high- (60 U) dose insulin injections with an appliance. Patients rated pens using an ease of use questionnaire and were asked separately for final pen preferences.
Main outcome measures: The Insulin Device 'Ease of Use' Battery is a 10-item questionnaire with a 7-point scale (higher scores reflect greater ease of use). The primary objective was to determine pen preference for 'easy to press to inject my dose' (by comparing composite scores [low- plus high-dose]). Secondary objectives were to determine pen preference on select questionnaire items (from composite scores), final pen preference, and summary responses for all questionnaire items.
Results: On the primary endpoint, 'easy to press to inject my dose,' a statistically significant majority of patients with a preference chose the insulin lispro pen over the insulin aspart pen (68.4%, 95% CI = 62.7-73.6%). Statistically significant majorities of patients with a preference also favored the insulin lispro pen on secondary items: 'easy to hold in my hand when I inject' (64.9%, 95% CI = 58.8-70.7%), 'easy to use when I am in a public place' (67.5%, 95% CI = 61.0-73.6%), and 'overall easy to use' (69.9%, 95% CI = 63.9-75.4%). A statistically significant majority of patients had a final preference for the insulin lispro pen (67.3%, 95% CI = 62.2-72.1%).
Conclusions: Among pen-naïve patients with diabetes who had a preference, the majority preferred the insulin lispro pen over the insulin aspart pen with regard to ease of use. Study limitations included open-label design and injection simulation, use of an unvalidated questionnaire, and enrollment of mostly insulin-naïve patients.
Similar articles
-
Engineering study comparing injection force and dose accuracy between two prefilled insulin injection pens.Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Dec;25(12):2829-33. doi: 10.1185/03007990903327993. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009. PMID: 19916727
-
Comparative device assessments: Humalog KwikPen compared with vial and syringe and FlexPen.Diabetes Educ. 2009 Sep-Oct;35(5):789-98. doi: 10.1177/0145721709340056. Diabetes Educ. 2009. PMID: 19783767 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of usability and patient preference for the new disposable insulin device Solostar versus Flexpen, lilly disposable pen, and a prototype pen: an open-label study.Clin Ther. 2007 Apr;29(4):650-60. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.04.003. Clin Ther. 2007. PMID: 17617288
-
Dose accuracy and injection force dynamics of a novel disposable insulin pen.Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2007 Mar;4(2):165-74. doi: 10.1517/17425247.4.2.165. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2007. PMID: 17335413 Review.
-
Health economics and compliance of vials/syringes versus pen devices: a review of the evidence.Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010 Jun;12 Suppl 1:S101-8. doi: 10.1089/dia.2009.0180. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010. PMID: 20515297 Review.
Cited by
-
Patient Perceptions of and Preferences Between Characteristics of Injectable Diabetes Treatments.Diabetes Ther. 2021 Sep;12(9):2387-2403. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01097-9. Epub 2021 Jul 23. Diabetes Ther. 2021. PMID: 34297341 Free PMC article.
-
Attributes Influencing Insulin Pen Preference Among Caregivers and Patients With Diabetes Who Require Greater Than 20 Units of Mealtime Insulin.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016 Jun 28;10(4):923-31. doi: 10.1177/1932296816633232. Print 2016 Jul. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016. PMID: 26920640 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Factors Affecting Performance of Insulin Pen Injector Technology: A Narrative Review.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Mar;17(2):290-301. doi: 10.1177/19322968221145201. Epub 2022 Dec 20. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023. PMID: 36540004 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of patient preference for two insulin injection pen devices in relation to patient dexterity skills.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012 Jul 1;6(4):910-6. doi: 10.1177/193229681200600423. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012. PMID: 22920818 Free PMC article.
-
Patient preferences for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a scoping review.Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Oct;31(10):877-92. doi: 10.1007/s40273-013-0089-7. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013. PMID: 24081453
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical