Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul;80(4):511-8.
doi: 10.2319/072309-411.1.

A cephalometric study to investigate the skeletal relationships in patients with increasing severity of hypodontia

Affiliations

A cephalometric study to investigate the skeletal relationships in patients with increasing severity of hypodontia

Priti N Acharya et al. Angle Orthod. 2010 Jul.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the skeletal relationships in patients with hypodontia and analyze the effects of severity and pattern.

Materials and methods: Pretreatment lateral cephalograms from 277 patients with hypodontia, categorized by the number of missing teeth as mild (1-2), moderate (3-5), or severe (> or =6), were digitized recording angular measurements and ratios and compared with published norms matched for age and gender. Pattern was determined as mandibular, maxillary, bimaxillary, bilateral, anterior, posterior, and anteroposterior. Linear regression models assessed relationships between number of missing teeth and cephalometric parameters, controlling for the pattern of hypodontia.

Results: For every additional missing tooth, SNA, SNB, and ANB decreased 0.3 degrees , 0.1 degrees , and 0.2 degrees , respectively; this was clinically significant for >4, >10, and >5 missing teeth, respectively. Mandibular to cranial base ratio decreased 0.3% for every additional missing tooth; this was clinically significant for >10 missing teeth. The MMPA decreased 0.3 degrees for every additional missing tooth; this was clinically significant for >7 missing teeth. Percentage LAFH decreased 0.2% for every additional missing tooth; this was significant for >7 missing teeth. Jarabak ratio increased 0.2% for each additional missing tooth; this was clinically significant for >10 missing teeth. Anterior hypodontia significantly decreased most cephalometric parameters.

Conclusions: Patients with hypodontia demonstrated a tendency toward a Class III relationship, caused by decreased maxillary and mandibular angular prognathism and MnCB ratio, though the effect was greater on the maxilla than the mandible. Clinical significance was only associated with severe hypodontia. Vertically, there was a tendency toward decreased MMPA and %LAFH; this was clinically relevant only with severe hypodontia. Anterior hypodontia had a significant effect on skeletal relationship.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Histogram of the number of missing teeth.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Plots for angular measurements showing a statistically significant linear association with the total number of missing teeth, categorized as mild, moderate and severe hypodontia.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Plots for ratio measurements showing a statistically significant linear association with the total number of missing teeth, categorized as mild, moderate and severe hypodontia.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Goodman J. R, Jones S. P, Hobkirk J. A, King P. A. Hypodontia: 1. Clinical features and the management of mild to moderate hypodontia. Dent Update. 1994;21:381–384.
    1. Dhanrajani P. J. Hypodontia: etiology, clinical features, and management. Quintessence Int. 2002;33:294–302. - PubMed
    1. Hobkirk J. A, Brook A. H. The management of patients with severe hypodontia. J Oral Rehabil. 1980;7:289–298. - PubMed
    1. Hobkirk J. A, King P. A, Goodman J. R, Jones S. P. Hypodontia: 2. The management of severe hypodontia. Dent Update. 1995;22:8–11. - PubMed
    1. Polder B. J, Van't Hof M. A, Van der Linden F. P. G. M, Kuijpers-Jagtman A. M. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004;32:217–226. - PubMed