Cytotoxic effects of orthodontic composites
- PMID: 20482365
- PMCID: PMC8966438
- DOI: 10.2319/092809-537.1
Cytotoxic effects of orthodontic composites
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the cytotoxic effects of five different light-cured orthodontic bonding composites.
Materials and methods: The orthodontic composites Heliosit Orthodontic (Ivoclar), Transbond XT (3M Unitek), Bisco ORTHO (Bisco), Light Bond (Reliance), and Quick Cure (Reliance) were prepared, and the samples were extracted in 3 mL of BME (Basal Medium Eagle) with 10% newborn calf serum for 24 hours. The L929 cells were plated (25,000 cells/mL) in a 96-well dish and maintained in a humidified incubator for 24 hours at 37 degrees C, 5% CO(2), and 95% air. After 24 hours of incubation of the cells, the incubation medium was replaced by the immersed medium in which the samples were stored. Then, L929 cells were incubated in contact with eluates for 24 hours. The cell mitochondrial activity was evaluated by the methyl tetrazolium (MTT) test. Twelve wells were used for each specimen, and the MTT tests were applied two times. The data were statistically analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD tests.
Results: Results with L929 fibroblasts demonstrated that except for Transbond XT, freshly prepared composite materials did not reduce vital cell numbers (P > .05) compared with the control group. Our data demonstrate that Transbond XT showed significant cytotoxicity compared with the control group.
Conclusion: Results indicate that tested orthodontic bonding composites are suitable for clinical application, but that further studies using different test methods are needed for Transbond XT.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Cytotoxic effects of resin-modified orthodontic band adhesives. Are they safe?Angle Orthod. 2010 Sep;80(5):890-5. doi: 10.2319/101509-577.1. Angle Orthod. 2010. PMID: 20578860 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of plasma-emulating light-emitting diode (LED) versus conventional LED on cytotoxic effects and polymerization capacity of orthodontic composites.Hum Exp Toxicol. 2014 Oct;33(10):1000-7. doi: 10.1177/0960327113520020. Epub 2014 Jan 21. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2014. PMID: 24449760
-
Effects of staining solutions on the discoloration of orthodontic adhesives: an in-vitro study.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Dec;138(6):741-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.12.029. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010. PMID: 21130333
-
Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Jan;119(1):30-5. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.111399. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001. PMID: 11174537
-
Effects of 3 adhesion promoters on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets: an in-vitro study.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Mar;129(3):390-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.08.022. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006. PMID: 16527635
Cited by
-
Comparative In Vitro Biocompatibility Study of the Two Orthodontic Bonding Materials of Different Types.Polymers (Basel). 2022 Nov 18;14(22):4998. doi: 10.3390/polym14224998. Polymers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36433124 Free PMC article.
-
In Vitro Cytotoxicity Assessment of an Orthodontic Composite Containing Titanium-dioxide Nano-particles.J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2013 Fall;7(4):192-8. doi: 10.5681/joddd.2013.031. Epub 2013 Dec 18. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2013. PMID: 24578816 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of two low-shrinkage composites on dental stem cells (viability, cell damaged or apoptosis and mesenchymal markers expression).J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2013 Apr;24(4):979-88. doi: 10.1007/s10856-013-4849-x. Epub 2013 Jan 26. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2013. PMID: 23354738
-
Evaluation of the toxic potential of Bisphenol-A glycidylmethacrylate (BisGMA) on the third instar larvae of transgenic Drosophila.Toxicol Res (Camb). 2024 Mar 4;13(2):tfae026. doi: 10.1093/toxres/tfae026. eCollection 2024 Apr. Toxicol Res (Camb). 2024. PMID: 38450176 Free PMC article.
-
Bond strength, degree of conversion, and microorganism adhesion using different bracket-to-enamel bonding protocols.J Orofac Orthop. 2023 Oct;84(Suppl 3):210-221. doi: 10.1007/s00056-022-00430-6. Epub 2022 Oct 17. J Orofac Orthop. 2023. PMID: 36251054 English.
References
-
- Zachrisson B. U, Buyukyilmaz T. Bonding in orthodontics. In: Graber T. M, Vanarsdall R. L, Vig K, editors. Orthodontics Current Principles and Techniques. Philadelphia, Pa: Elsevier Inc; 2005. pp. 579–659.
-
- Malkoc S, Uysal T, Usumez S, Isman E, Baysal A. In vitro assessment of temperature rise in the pulp during orthodontic bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. In press - PubMed
-
- Eliades T, Eliades G. Orthodontic adhesive resins. In: Brantley W. A, Eliades T, editors. Orthodontic Materials Scientific and Clinical Aspects. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme; 2001. pp. 201–220.
-
- Gioka C, Bourauel C, Hiskia A, Kletsas D, Eliades T, Eliades G. Light-cured or chemically cured orthodontic adhesive resins? A selection based on the degree of cure, monomer leaching, and cytotoxicity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127:413–419; quiz 516. - PubMed
-
- Wahata J. C. Principles of biocompability. In: Brantley W. A, Eliades T, editors. Orthodontic Materials Scientific and Clinical Aspects. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme; 2001. pp. 271–286.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources