Twenty-first century challenges for biomaterials
- PMID: 20484227
- PMCID: PMC2943892
- DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2010.0151.focus
Twenty-first century challenges for biomaterials
Abstract
During the 1960s and 1970s, a first generation of materials was specially developed for use inside the human body. These developments became the basis for the field of biomaterials. The devices made from biomaterials are called prostheses. Professor Bill Bonfield was one of the first to recognize the importance of understanding the mechanical properties of tissues, especially bone, in order to achieve reliable skeletal prostheses. His research was one of the pioneering efforts to understand the interaction of biomaterials with living tissues. The goal of all early biomaterials was to 'achieve a suitable combination of physical properties to match those of the replaced tissue with a minimal toxic response in the host'. By 1980, there were more than 50 implanted prostheses in clinical use made from 40 different materials. At that time, more than three million prosthetic parts were being implanted in patients worldwide each year. A common feature of most of the 40 materials was biological 'inertness'. Almost all materials used in the body were single-phase materials. Most implant materials were adaptations of already existing commercial materials with higher levels of purity to eliminate release of toxic by-products and minimize corrosion. This article is a tribute to Bill Bonfield's pioneering efforts in the field of bone biomechanics, biomaterials and interdisciplinary research. It is also a brief summary of the evolution of bioactive materials and the opportunities for tailoring the composition, texture and surface chemistry of them to meet five important challenges for the twenty-first century.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Properties of biomaterials.J Arthroplasty. 1986;1(2):143-7. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(86)80053-5. J Arthroplasty. 1986. PMID: 3559583
-
[Biodeterioration and corrosion of metallic implants and prostheses].Medicina (B Aires). 1993;53(3):260-74. Medicina (B Aires). 1993. PMID: 8114635 Review. Spanish.
-
Materials characteristics of uncoated/ceramic-coated implant materials.Adv Dent Res. 1999 Jun;13:21-6. doi: 10.1177/08959374990130011001. Adv Dent Res. 1999. PMID: 11276742
-
Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants: current status and future developments.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 Jan-Feb;15(1):15-46. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000. PMID: 10697938 Review.
-
Dental biomaterials: where are we and where are we going?J Dent Educ. 2005 May;69(5):571-85. J Dent Educ. 2005. PMID: 15897337 Review.
Cited by
-
The biological response to orthopaedic implants for joint replacement: Part I: Metals.J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2017 Oct;105(7):2162-2173. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33734. Epub 2016 Jun 21. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2017. PMID: 27328111 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Towards single cell encapsulation for precision biology and medicine.Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2023 Oct;201:115010. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2023.115010. Epub 2023 Jul 16. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2023. PMID: 37454931 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Microenvironment-targeted strategy steers advanced bone regeneration.Mater Today Bio. 2023 Jul 21;22:100741. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100741. eCollection 2023 Oct. Mater Today Bio. 2023. PMID: 37576867 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bioactive Glasses: From Parent 45S5 Composition to Scaffold-Assisted Tissue-Healing Therapies.J Funct Biomater. 2018 Mar 16;9(1):24. doi: 10.3390/jfb9010024. J Funct Biomater. 2018. PMID: 29547544 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current status and future prospects of stomatology research.J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2023 Aug 7;24(10):853-867. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B2200702. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2023. PMID: 37752088 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Aitasalo K., Kinnunen I., Palmgren J., Varpula M. 2001. Repair of orbital floor fractures with bioactive glass implants. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 59, 1390–1395. - PubMed
-
- Ameri E., Behtash H., Mobini B., Omidi-Kashani F., Nojomi M. 2009. Bioactive glass versus autogenous iliac crest bone graft in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Acta Med. Iran. 47, 41–45.
-
- Atwood R., Jones C. J. R., Lee P. D., Hench L. L. 2004. Analysis of pore interconnectivity in bioactive glass foams using X-ray microtomography. Scripta Mater. 51, 1029–1033. (10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.08.014) - DOI
-
- Bellantone M., Hench L. L. 2001. Bioactive behaviour of antibacterial bioactive glass. Key Eng. Mater. 192–195, 617–620. (10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.192-195.617) - DOI
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources