Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar-Apr;18(2):186-93.
doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572010000200014.

Reliability and discriminatory power of methods for dental plaque quantification

Affiliations

Reliability and discriminatory power of methods for dental plaque quantification

Daniela Prócida Raggio et al. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Objective: This in situ study evaluated the discriminatory power and reliability of methods of dental plaque quantification and the relationship between visual indices (VI) and fluorescence camera (FC) to detect plaque.

Material and methods: Six volunteers used palatal appliances with six bovine enamel blocks presenting different stages of plaque accumulation. The presence of plaque with and without disclosing was assessed using VI. Images were obtained with FC and digital camera in both conditions. The area covered by plaque was assessed. Examinations were done by two independent examiners. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Kappa tests to compare different conditions of samples and to assess the inter-examiner reproducibility.

Results: Some methods presented adequate reproducibility. The Turesky index and the assessment of area covered by disclosed plaque in the FC images presented the highest discriminatory powers.

Conclusion: The Turesky index and images with FC with disclosing present good reliability and discriminatory power in quantifying dental plaque.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Palatal appliance used in the in situ study. (a) Schematic drawing - six blocks: three protected with a plastic mesh and three with no protection; (b) Position of the blocks inside the recess in the acrylic flange

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Addy M, Renton-Harper P, Newcombe R. Plaque regrowth studies: discriminatory power of plaque index compared to plaque area. J Clin Periodontol. 1999;26:110–112. - PubMed
    1. Angmar-Mansson B, ten Bosch JJ. Quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF): a method for assessment of incipient caries lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2001;30:298–307. - PubMed
    1. Block PL, Lobene RR, Derdivanis JP. A two-tone dye test for dental plaque. J Periodontol. 1972;43:423–426. - PubMed
    1. Breuer MM, Cosgrove RS. The relationship between gingivitis and plaque levels. J Periodontol. 1989;60:172–175. - PubMed
    1. Claydon N, Addy M. The use of planimetry to record and score the modified Navy index and other area-based plaque índices. A comparative toothbrush study. J Clin Periodontol. 1995;22:670–673. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances