[Somatosensory evoked potentials in carotid surgery]

Abstract

During carotid surgery a monitoring device that will identify patients with inadequate cerebral perfusion and impending cerebral damage after carotid clamping is desirable. Such patients may benefit from cerebral protective measures, which should be applied selectively as their use can also lead to complications. METHODS. In order to evaluate the reliability of somatosensory evoked responses as a means of detecting patients with insufficient collateral perfusion after carotid cross clamping, a prospective study involving 482 operations for reconstruction of supraaortic vessels was performed. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were recorded from a cervical (C2-Fz) and a parietal (C3'/C4'-Fz) electrode above the ipsilateral hemisphere following stimulation of the contralateral median nerve. RESULTS. In 22 procedures (4.6%) complete flattening of the cortical SEP occurred after carotid cross clamping. In 7 of 9 cases in which no indwelling shunt was used despite electrical silence neurological deficits were found postoperatively. The SEP amplitude was restored in 12 of the remaining 13 patients with complete loss of the SEP after shunt insertion. Only 3 of these patients demonstrated neurological impairment. During 460 operations evoked potentials were always present. Nevertheless, 5 neurological sequelae were noticed despite unchanged SEP after carotid artery clamping. All deficits, however, were caused by embolization and were unrelated to reduced blood flow after carotid cross clamping. CONCLUSIONS. Our results confirm the reliability of SEP monitoring for the detection of significant cerebral ischemia after carotid clamping. In absence of the cortical SEP immediate shunt placement is necessary to avoid neurological deficits. On the other hand, the risks attendant on indiscriminate cerebral support (embolism after shunt placement, cardiac ischemia due to induced hypertension) can be avoided in the presence of cortical potentials. This allows protection of the heart and the brain by anesthetic management and enables the surgeon to perform endarterectomy with no hurry, to avoid technical failure. SEP data may also be helpful in decision making on reoperation to look for sources of embolization. In conclusion, advanced monitoring by somatosensory evoked responses may help to improve the outcome of carotid surgery.