Influence of adherence to the national guidance on nutrition screening and dietitian referral on clinical outcomes of those requiring parenteral nutrition
- PMID: 20487178
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2010.01041.x
Influence of adherence to the national guidance on nutrition screening and dietitian referral on clinical outcomes of those requiring parenteral nutrition
Abstract
Background: National guidance in the UK on nutrition support suggests that all patients should be screened on initial admission to hospital and, where appropriate, be referred to a healthcare professional. The present study aimed to investigate whether initial nutrition screening influenced the outcome of patients who received parenteral nutrition (PN).
Methods: Data were prospectively evaluated on 100 consecutive patients referred to the multidisciplinary PN team in a teaching hospital. Information was obtained from medical notes, electronic patient records, completed PN prescription charts, dietetic record cards and nursing care plans. Patients who were treatable by nutritional supplements or enteral nutrition were not included. Patients were divided into two groups: guidance compliant and guidance noncompliant, in order to compare outcome measures such as the duration of PN treatment, total number of PN bags used per patient and length of hospital stay. Comparison of data between the two groups was carried out using either the independent samples t-test or the Mann-Whitney U-test.
Results: There was no difference in outcome measures between the guidance compliant and noncompliant groups. Patients in the guidance noncompliant group were more likely to be in general (77%) than critical wards (23%). Patients who were in the guidance compliant group received nutrition support earlier.
Conclusions: Compliance with the national guidance in the UK on screening did not improve outcomes in patients requiring parenteral nutrition in this cohort. Initial nutrition screening prior to PN administration warrants further investigation to ensure value is added to patient care.
Similar articles
-
Adherence to the National Institute of Clinical Excellence guidance on parenteral nutrition screening is not enough to improve outcomes.Clin Nutr. 2013 Feb;32(1):73-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.05.015. Epub 2012 Jun 9. Clin Nutr. 2013. PMID: 22687466
-
Assessing the appropriateness of parenteral nutrition use in hospitalized patients. A comparison on parenteral nutrition bag prescription in different wards and nutritional outcomes.Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2018 Jun;25:87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2018.01.072. Epub 2018 Apr 25. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2018. PMID: 29779824
-
Assessing appropriateness of parenteral nutrition usage in an acute hospital.Nutr Clin Pract. 2013 Apr;28(2):232-6. doi: 10.1177/0884533612469988. Epub 2012 Dec 21. Nutr Clin Pract. 2013. PMID: 23263928
-
Improving patient outcomes through registered dietitian order writing.Nutr Clin Pract. 2013 Oct;28(5):556-65. doi: 10.1177/0884533613499375. Epub 2013 Aug 22. Nutr Clin Pract. 2013. PMID: 23969268 Review.
-
Organisation, regulations, preparation and logistics of parenteral nutrition in hospitals and homes; the role of the nutrition support team - Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition, Chapter 8.Ger Med Sci. 2009 Nov 18;7:Doc20. doi: 10.3205/000079. Ger Med Sci. 2009. PMID: 20049081 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Nutritional screening for improving professional practice for patient outcomes in hospital and primary care settings.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 6;2013(6):CD005539. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005539.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 23744516 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources