Pre-transplant cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus remains the most important determinant of CMV reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the era of surveillance and preemptive therapy
- PMID: 20487414
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3062.2010.00504.x
Pre-transplant cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus remains the most important determinant of CMV reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the era of surveillance and preemptive therapy
Abstract
Between January 2001 and June 2008, 315 adult patients (median age 43 years, range 16-65) including 203 males and 112 females undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) had serial monitoring for cytomegalovirus (CMV) followed by initiation of preemptive therapy. The majority (62.1%) had a conventional myeloablative transplant with 116 (36.9%) having a reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) transplant, using either matched sibling/family (63.3%) or unrelated donors (36.7%). Graft source was peripheral blood stem cells in 257 (81.5%), bone marrow in 41 (13.1%), and cord blood in 16 (5.4%). T-cell depletion with anti-thymocyte globulin or alemtuzumab was used in 35%. Based upon CMV serostatus, patients were classified into low risk (donor [D]-/recipient [R]-), intermediate risk (D+/R-), or high risk (D-/R+ or D+/R+). Serial weekly monitoring for CMV viremia was performed using a qualitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and when positive, quantification was done using either pp65 antigen or a quantitative PCR. CMV reactivation was seen in 123 patients (39.1%) at a median of 50 days post HSCT (range 22-1978). CMV serostatus was the most important risk factor with incidence of 53% in the high-risk group (53.3%) compared with 10.2% in the intermediate risk and 0% in the low-risk group (P<0.0001). Other significant risk factors identified included use of alemtuzumab during conditioning (P=0.03), RIC transplants (P=0.06), and the presence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (P<0.0001). On a multivariate analysis, CMV serostatus, RIC transplants, and acute GVHD remained independent predictors of CMV reactivation. All were treated with antiviral therapy with responses seen in 109 (88.6%). Sixteen patients (13%) developed CMV disease at a median of 59 days post HSCT (range 26 days-46 months), 8 of whom died. At a median follow up of 43 months (range 6-93), 166 patients (52.6%) are alive with a significantly higher survival among patients without CMV reactivation (57.2%) as compared with patients with CMV reactivation (45.5%; P=0.049). CMV reactivation and disease remains a major problem in high-risk patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT. Novel prophylactic measures such as immunotherapy and drug prophylaxis need to be considered in this specific group of patients.
Similar articles
-
Fludarabine-based reduced intensity conditioning transplants have a higher incidence of cytomegalovirus reactivation compared with myeloablative transplants.Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010 May;45(5):849-55. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2009.273. Epub 2009 Nov 16. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010. PMID: 19915635
-
Tetramer monitoring to assess risk factors for recurrent cytomegalovirus reactivation and reconstitution of antiviral immunity post allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Transpl Infect Dis. 2011 Jun;13(3):222-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3062.2011.00626.x. Epub 2011 May 18. Transpl Infect Dis. 2011. PMID: 21585633
-
Cytomegalovirus infection and disease after reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation: single-centre experience.Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010 Mar;45(3):534-42. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2009.180. Epub 2009 Aug 10. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010. PMID: 19668235 Clinical Trial.
-
Alloreactivity as therapeutic principle in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. Studies of clinical and immunologic aspects of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with nonmyeloablative conditioning.Dan Med Bull. 2007 May;54(2):112-39. Dan Med Bull. 2007. PMID: 17521527 Review.
-
[Monitoring of CMV infection after bone marrow transplantation].Nihon Rinsho. 1998 Jan;56(1):189-92. Nihon Rinsho. 1998. PMID: 9465688 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
Anti-CMV-IgG positivity of donors is beneficial for alloHSCT recipients with respect to the better short-term immunological recovery and high level of CD4+CD25high lymphocytes.Viruses. 2015 Mar 23;7(3):1391-408. doi: 10.3390/v7031391. Viruses. 2015. PMID: 25807050 Free PMC article.
-
The Ten Most Common Questions on Cytomegalovirus Infection in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients.Clin Hematol Int. 2023 Mar;5(1):21-28. doi: 10.1007/s44228-022-00025-3. Epub 2022 Dec 29. Clin Hematol Int. 2023. PMID: 36577863 Free PMC article. Review.
-
HCMV infection of humanized mice after transplantation of G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells from HCMV-seropositive donors.Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014 Jan;20(1):132-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.10.019. Epub 2013 Oct 23. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014. PMID: 24161922 Free PMC article.
-
Efficiency and risk factors for CMV transmission in seronegative hematopoietic stem cell recipients.Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012 Sep;18(9):1391-1400. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.02.008. Epub 2012 Mar 3. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012. PMID: 22387334 Free PMC article.
-
Cytomegalovirus Infection after CD34(+)-Selected Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016 Aug;22(8):1480-1486. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.05.003. Epub 2016 May 10. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016. PMID: 27178374 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical