Unintended effects of statins in men and women in England and Wales: population based cohort study using the QResearch database
- PMID: 20488911
- PMCID: PMC2874131
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c2197
Unintended effects of statins in men and women in England and Wales: population based cohort study using the QResearch database
Abstract
Objective: To quantify the unintended effects of statins according to type, dose, and duration of use.
Design: Prospective open cohort study using routinely collected data.
Setting: 368 general practices in England and Wales supplying data to the QResearch database.
Participants: 2 004 692 patients aged 30-84 years of whom 225 922 (10.7%) were new users of statins: 159 790 (70.7%) were prescribed simvastatin, 50 328 (22.3%) atorvastatin, 8103 (3.6%) pravastatin, 4497 (1.9%) rosuvastatin, and 3204 (1.4%) fluvastatin.
Methods: Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate effects of statin type, dose, and duration of use. The number needed to treat (NNT) or number needed to harm (NNH) was calculated and numbers of additional or fewer cases estimated for 10 000 treated patients.
Main outcome measure: First recorded occurrence of cardiovascular disease, moderate or serious myopathic events, moderate or serious liver dysfunction, acute renal failure, venous thromboembolism, Parkinson's disease, dementia, rheumatoid arthritis, cataract, osteoporotic fracture, gastric cancer, oesophageal cancer, colon cancer, lung cancer, melanoma, renal cancer, breast cancer, or prostate cancer.
Results: Individual statins were not significantly associated with risk of Parkinson's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, venous thromboembolism, dementia, osteoporotic fracture, gastric cancer, colon cancer, lung cancer, melanoma, renal cancer, breast cancer, or prostate cancer. Statin use was associated with decreased risks of oesophageal cancer but increased risks of moderate or serious liver dysfunction, acute renal failure, moderate or serious myopathy, and cataract. Adverse effects were similar across statin types for each outcome except liver dysfunction where risks were highest for fluvastatin. A dose-response effect was apparent for acute renal failure and liver dysfunction. All increased risks persisted during treatment and were highest in the first year. After stopping treatment the risk of cataract returned to normal within a year in men and women. Risk of oesophageal cancer returned to normal within a year in women and within 1-3 years in men. Risk of acute renal failure returned to normal within 1-3 years in men and women, and liver dysfunction within 1-3 years in women and from three years in men. Based on the 20% threshold for cardiovascular risk, for women the NNT with any statin to prevent one case of cardiovascular disease over five years was 37 (95% confidence interval 27 to 64) and for oesophageal cancer was 1266 (850 to 3460) and for men the respective values were 33 (24 to 57) and 1082 (711 to 2807). In women the NNH for an additional case of acute renal failure over five years was 434 (284 to 783), of moderate or severe myopathy was 259 (186 to 375), of moderate or severe liver dysfunction was 136 (109 to 175), and of cataract was 33 (28 to 38). Overall, the NNHs and NNTs for men were similar to those for women, except for myopathy where the NNH was 91 (74 to 112).
Conclusions: Claims of unintended benefits of statins, except for oesophageal cancer, remain unsubstantiated, although potential adverse effects at population level were confirmed and quantified. Further studies are needed to develop utilities to individualise the risks so that patients at highest risk of adverse events can be monitored closely.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: JH-C is codirector of QResearch (a not for profit organisation that is a joint partnership between the University of Nottingham and EMIS, the leading commercial supplier of IT for 60% of general practices in the United Kingdom) and director of ClinRisk, which produces software to ensure the reliable and updatable implementation of clinical risk algorithms within clinical computer systems to improve patient care. CC is a consultant statistician for ClinRisk. This work and any views expressed within it are solely those of the authors and not of any affiliated bodies or organisations.
Comment in
-
Balancing the intended and unintended effects of statins.BMJ. 2010 May 20;340:c2240. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2240. BMJ. 2010. PMID: 20488914 No abstract available.
-
Statin use associated with increased risk of cataract, myopathy, liver dysfunction and acute renal failure with varying numbers needed to harm.Evid Based Med. 2010 Dec;15(6):187-8. doi: 10.1136/ebm1103. Epub 2010 Jul 7. Evid Based Med. 2010. PMID: 20610446 No abstract available.
-
Unintended effects of statins. Yellow card reports add to data.BMJ. 2010 Jul 13;341:c3697. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c3697. BMJ. 2010. PMID: 20627983 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Individualising the risks of statins in men and women in England and Wales: population-based cohort study.Heart. 2010 Jun;96(12):939-47. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2010.199034. Epub 2010 May 20. Heart. 2010. PMID: 20489220
-
Predicting the adverse risk of statin treatment: an independent and external validation of Qstatin risk scores in the UK.Heart. 2012 Jul;98(14):1091-7. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302014. Epub 2012 Jun 11. Heart. 2012. PMID: 22689714
-
Risk of incident diabetes among patients treated with statins: population based study.BMJ. 2013 May 23;346:f2610. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2610. BMJ. 2013. PMID: 23704171 Free PMC article.
-
Statin-associated incident diabetes: a literature review.Consult Pharm. 2014;29(5):317-34. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2014.317. Consult Pharm. 2014. PMID: 24849689 Review.
-
The causes and effects of socio-demographic exclusions from clinical trials.Health Technol Assess. 2005 Oct;9(38):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-152. doi: 10.3310/hta9380. Health Technol Assess. 2005. PMID: 16181564 Review.
Cited by
-
Current Perspectives on rosuvastatin.Integr Blood Press Control. 2013 Apr 18;6:15-25. doi: 10.2147/IBPC.S34814. Print 2013. Integr Blood Press Control. 2013. PMID: 23637557 Free PMC article.
-
Development and validation of risk prediction algorithms to estimate future risk of common cancers in men and women: prospective cohort study.BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 17;5(3):e007825. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007825. BMJ Open. 2015. PMID: 25783428 Free PMC article.
-
Proton pump inhibitors and the risk of pneumonia: a comparison of cohort and self-controlled case series designs.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Jun 24;13:82. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-82. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013. PMID: 23800078 Free PMC article.
-
Dandelion Polysaccharides Ameliorate High-Fat-Diet-Induced Atherosclerosis in Mice through Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Capabilities.Nutrients. 2023 Sep 24;15(19):4120. doi: 10.3390/nu15194120. Nutrients. 2023. PMID: 37836404 Free PMC article.
-
Derivation, validation, and evaluation of a new QRISK model to estimate lifetime risk of cardiovascular disease: cohort study using QResearch database.BMJ. 2010 Dec 9;341:c6624. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c6624. BMJ. 2010. PMID: 21148212 Free PMC article.
References
-
- British Heart Foundation. Coronary heart disease statistics. BHF, 2007.
-
- Cholesterol Treatment Trialist Collaborators. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet 2005;366:1267-78. - PubMed
-
- Department of Health. Putting prevention first—vascular checks: risk assessment and management. 2008. www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPoli....
-
- Thavendiranathan P, Bagai A, Brookhart MA, Choudhry NK. Primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases with statin therapy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:2307-13. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical