Morphology, Attenuation, Size, and Structure (MASS) criteria: assessing response and predicting clinical outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma on antiangiogenic targeted therapy
- PMID: 20489085
- DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.3456
Morphology, Attenuation, Size, and Structure (MASS) criteria: assessing response and predicting clinical outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma on antiangiogenic targeted therapy
Abstract
Objective: The objective of our study was to evaluate response assessment and predict clinical outcome in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) receiving antiangiogenic targeted therapy. Target lesions were assessed on routine contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) images obtained during the portal venous phase using new response criteria.
Materials and methods: Standard CECT examinations of patients with metastatic clear cell RCC on first-line sunitinib or sorafenib therapy (n = 84) were retrospectively evaluated using Mass, Attenuation, Size, and Structure (MASS) Criteria; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST); Size and Attenuation CT (SACT) Criteria; and modified Choi Criteria. The objective response to therapy was compared with clinical outcomes including time to progression (TTP) and disease-specific survival. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival functions.
Results: A favorable response according to MASS Criteria had a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 100% in identifying patients with a good clinical outcome (i.e., progression-free survival of > 250 days) versus 17% and 100%, respectively, for RECIST partial response. The objective categories of response used by MASS Criteria-favorable response, indeterminate response, and unfavorable response-differed significantly from one another with respect to TTP (p < 0.0001, log-rank test) and disease-specific survival (p < 0.0001, log-rank test).
Conclusion: Assessment of metastatic RCC target lesions on CECT for changes in morphology, attenuation, size, and structure by MASS Criteria is more accurate than response assessment by SACT Criteria, RECIST, or modified Choi Criteria. Furthermore, the use of MASS Criteria for imaging response assessment showed high interobserver agreement and may predict disease outcome in patients with metastatic RCC on targeted therapy.
Comment in
-
Kidney cancer: MASS criteria predict good clinical outcome.Nat Rev Urol. 2010 Jul;7(7):366. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2010.96. Nat Rev Urol. 2010. PMID: 20665940 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Assessing tumor response and detecting recurrence in metastatic renal cell carcinoma on targeted therapy: importance of size and attenuation on contrast-enhanced CT.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jan;194(1):157-65. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2941. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010. PMID: 20028918
-
Comparison of four early posttherapy imaging changes (EPTIC; RECIST 1.0, tumor shrinkage, computed tomography tumor density, Choi criteria) in assessing outcome to vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.Eur Urol. 2011 May;59(5):856-62. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.01.038. Epub 2011 Feb 1. Eur Urol. 2011. PMID: 21306819
-
Utilizing pre-therapy clinical schema and initial CT changes to predict progression-free survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma on VEGF-targeted therapy: a preliminary analysis.Urol Oncol. 2013 Oct;31(7):1283-91. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.08.010. Epub 2011 Sep 29. Urol Oncol. 2013. PMID: 21956044
-
Metastatic renal cell carcinoma: radiologic findings and assessment of response to targeted antiangiogenic therapy by using multidetector CT.Radiographics. 2013 Oct;33(6):1691-716. doi: 10.1148/rg.336125110. Radiographics. 2013. PMID: 24108558 Review.
-
[Interdisciplinary recommendations for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma].Aktuelle Urol. 2009 Jan;40(1):27-30. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1098786. Epub 2009 Jan 28. Aktuelle Urol. 2009. PMID: 19177318 German.
Cited by
-
The association of clinical outcome to first-line VEGF-targeted therapy with clinical outcome to second-line VEGF-targeted therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients.Target Oncol. 2013 Sep;8(3):203-209. doi: 10.1007/s11523-012-0252-7. Epub 2013 Jan 9. Target Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23300029 Free PMC article.
-
RECIST 1.1 compared with RECIST 1.0 in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Mar;204(3):W282-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13236. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015. PMID: 25714313 Free PMC article.
-
Metastatic renal cell cancer.Cancer Imaging. 2013 Sep 23;13(3):374-80. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2013.9035. Cancer Imaging. 2013. PMID: 24061106 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: focus on pazopanib.Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2011;5:333-42. doi: 10.4137/CMO.S7263. Epub 2011 Oct 31. Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2011. PMID: 22084622 Free PMC article.
-
Molecular targeted therapies in non-GIST soft tissue sarcomas: what the radiologist needs to know.Cancer Imaging. 2013 May 2;13(2):197-211. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2013.0022. Cancer Imaging. 2013. PMID: 23649384 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical