Does femoral strain distribution coincide with the occurrence of cervical versus trochanteric hip fractures? An experimental finite element study
- PMID: 20490945
- DOI: 10.1007/s11517-010-0622-1
Does femoral strain distribution coincide with the occurrence of cervical versus trochanteric hip fractures? An experimental finite element study
Abstract
The objective of this experimental finite element (FE) study is to test the hypothesis that strain distributions coincide with the occurrence of cervical versus trochanteric hip fractures during loading conditions simulating a sideways fall, and that the cervical versus trochanteric principal strain ratio predicts different fracture patterns. Cadaver femora (female, 83 +/- 9 years) were CT scanned and mechanically tested simulating a fall. Thirteen cervical and 13 trochanteric fracture cases were selected for FE analysis. Principal strain distributions were analysed, and strain ratio epsilon(C)/epsilon(T) for strain patterns over the cervical and trochanteric regions was computed. The ratio epsilon(C)/epsilon(T) in the femora with cervical fractures (mean +/- SD 1.103 +/- 0.127) differed from that in trochanteric fractures (0.925 +/- 0.137) (p = 0.001). The significant difference in the strain ratio between fracture types remained after accounting for femoral neck and trochanteric BMD (p = 0.014), showing that it is independent of BMD. Area under the ROC curve was 0.858 in the discrimination of fracture types. The model predicted the experimental fracture type correctly in 22 of 26 cases. The cervical versus trochanteric region principal strain ratio differed significantly between femora with experimental cervical versus trochanteric fractures, and 85% agreement was achieved for the occurrence of hip fracture types using a simple FE model.
Similar articles
-
Association of geometric factors and failure load level with the distribution of cervical vs. trochanteric hip fractures.J Bone Miner Res. 2006 Jun;21(6):895-901. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.060305. J Bone Miner Res. 2006. PMID: 16753020
-
Prediction of fracture location in the proximal femur using finite element models.Med Eng Phys. 2001 Nov;23(9):657-64. doi: 10.1016/s1350-4533(01)00094-7. Med Eng Phys. 2001. PMID: 11755810
-
BMD T-score discriminates trochanteric fractures from unfractured controls, whereas geometry discriminates cervical fracture cases from unfractured controls of similar BMD.Osteoporos Int. 2010 Jul;21(7):1269-76. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-1070-3. Epub 2009 Sep 26. Osteoporos Int. 2010. PMID: 19784537
-
Structural determinants of hip fracture in elderly women: re-analysis of the data from the EPIDOS study.Osteoporos Int. 2006 Feb;17(2):231-6. doi: 10.1007/s00198-005-1980-7. Epub 2005 Jun 28. Osteoporos Int. 2006. PMID: 15983728
-
Are the etiologies of cervical and trochanteric hip fractures different?Bone. 1996 Mar;18(3 Suppl):133S-137S. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(95)00490-4. Bone. 1996. PMID: 8777078 Review.
Cited by
-
A quasi-brittle continuum damage finite element model of the human proximal femur based on element deletion.Med Biol Eng Comput. 2013 Feb;51(1-2):219-31. doi: 10.1007/s11517-012-0986-5. Epub 2012 Nov 21. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2013. PMID: 23179412
-
Trabecular Plate Loss and Deteriorating Elastic Modulus of Femoral Trabecular Bone in Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures.Bone Res. 2013 Dec 31;1(4):346-54. doi: 10.4248/BR201304005. eCollection 2013 Dec. Bone Res. 2013. PMID: 26273512 Free PMC article.
-
Three-dimensional mapping of cortical porosity and thickness along the superolateral femoral neck in older women.Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 15;12(1):15544. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19866-2. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 36109611 Free PMC article.
-
Sensitivity of patient-specific vertebral finite element model from low dose imaging to material properties and loading conditions.Med Biol Eng Comput. 2011 Dec;49(12):1355-61. doi: 10.1007/s11517-011-0825-0. Epub 2011 Sep 17. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2011. PMID: 21927822
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical