Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct;50(10):2158-66.
doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02684.x. Epub 2010 Oct 4.

5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and pentastarch improves cryopreservation of cord blood cells over 10% DMSO

Affiliations

5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and pentastarch improves cryopreservation of cord blood cells over 10% DMSO

Jun Hayakawa et al. Transfusion. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Cell number and viability are important in cord blood (CB) transplantation. While 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is the standard medium, adding a starch to freezing medium is increasingly utilized as a cytoprotectant for the thawing process. Similar to hetastarch, pentastarch has the advantages of faster renal clearance and less effect on the coagulation system.

Study design and methods: We compared a lower DMSO concentration (5%) containing pentastarch with 10% DMSO and performed cell viability assay, colony-forming units (CFUs), and transplantation of CB cells in NOD/SCID IL2Rγ(null) mice.

Results: CB cells in 5% DMSO/pentastarch had similar CD34+, CD3+, and CD19+ cell percentages after thawing as fresh CB cells. CB cells in 5% DMSO/pentastarch had higher viability (83.3±9.23%) than those frozen in 10% DMSO (75.3±11.0%, p<0.05). We monitored cell viability postthaw every 30 minutes. The mean loss in the first 30 minutes was less in the 5% DMSO/pentastarch group. At the end of 3 hours, the viability decreased by a mean of 7.75% for the 5% DMSO/pentastarch and 17.5% for the 10% DMSO groups. CFUs were similar between the two cryopreserved groups. Frozen CB cells engrafted equally well in IL2Rγ(null) mice compared to fresh CB cells up to 24 weeks, and CB cells frozen in 5% DMSO/pentastarch engrafted better than those in 10% DMSO.

Conclusion: Our data indicate that the lower DMSO concentration with pentastarch represents an improvement in the CB cryopreservation process and could have wider clinical application as an alternate freezing medium over 10% DMSO.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no financial conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Cell viability after thawing. CB samples (n = 4) cryopreserved in (○) 10% DMSO or (■) 5% DMSO/pentastarch were thawed and maintained at room temperature. A small aliquot was sampled every 30 minutes and analyzed for 7-AAD by flow cytometry. The percentage of viable cells (Y-axis) is presented with respect to time postthaw (X-axis). The error bars represent standard errors of the mean. There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) between 10% DMSO and 5% DMSO/pentastarch at time points 30 minutes and onward.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Percentage of human cell engraftment in NOD/SCID ILZRγnull mice. CB MNCs (2 × 107 cells per mouse, top) or CD34-se1ected cells (CD34+, 1 × 106 per mouse, bottom) were infused (□, ○) fresh or (■, ●) after being frozen in 10% DMSO. Peripheral blood samples were assayed for human cells periodically. There were five mice per group; error bars represent standard error of the means.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Comparison of two freezing methods. Since most CB units are stored unselected, we infused CB MNCs fresh (■, 2 × 107, n = 6), after being frozen with 10% DMSO (□, 2 × 107 n = 7), or after 5% DMSO/pentastarch (formula image, 2 × 107 n = 6). The mean percentages of human CD45+ cells are plotted with respect to time after transplant. When t test was used to compare the two freezing methods, 5% DMSO/pentastarch had higher human cell engraftment at 6 weeks (p = 0.027, oneway ANOVA) and 12 weeks (p = 0.042, one-way ANOVA).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wagner JE, Rosenthal J, Sweetman R, Shu XO, Davies SM, Ramsay NK, McGlave PB, Sender L, Cairo MS. Successful transplantation of HLA-matched and HLA-mismatched umbilical cord blood from unrelated donors: analysis of engraftment and acute graft-versus-host disease. Blood 1996;88:795–802. - PubMed
    1. Gluckman E, Rocha V, Boyer-Chammard A, Locatelli F, Arcese W, Pasquini R, Ortega J, Souillet G, Ferreira E, Laporte JP, Fernandez M, Chastang C. Outcome of cord-blood transplantation from related and unrelated donors. Eurocord Transplant Group and the European Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group. N Engl J Med 1997;337: 373–81. - PubMed
    1. Laughlin MJ, Barker J, Bambach B, Koc ON, Rizzieri DA, Wagner JE, Gerson SL, Lazarus HM, Cairo M, Stevens CE, Rubinstein P, Kurtzberg J. Hematopoietic engraftment and survival in adult recipients of umbilical-cord blood from unrelated donors. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1815–22. - PubMed
    1. Rubinstein P, Carrier C, Scaradavou A, Kurtzberg J, Adamson J, Migliaccio AR, Berkowitz RL, Cabbad M, Dobrila NL, Taylor PE, Rosenfield RE, Stevens CE. Outcomes among 562 recipients of placental-blood transplants from unrelated donors. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1565–77. - PubMed
    1. Barker JN, Weisdorf DJ, Wagner JE. Creation of a double chimera after the transplantation of umbilical-cord blood from two partially matched unrelated donors. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1870–1. - PubMed

Publication types