Studies on the usefulness of intranasal inactivated influenza vaccines
- PMID: 20493820
- DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.05.019
Studies on the usefulness of intranasal inactivated influenza vaccines
Abstract
Intranasal inactivated influenza vaccines have the advantage over parenteral vaccines in that they are not associated with the pain of an injection. However, they would be most useful if they were available for all age groups, including high-risk groups, and also would provide cross-protection against variant virus strains. Supporting the latter objective is our observation that intranasal inactivated vaccines provide cross-protection against variants within a subtype of the A virus (or variants within the B virus), together with inducing highly cross-reactive secretory-IgA antibodies to viral HA and the weakly cross-reactive IgG antibodies in the respiratory tract. This review summarizes the most important observations of our studies on intranasal inactivated influenza vaccines, which have been ongoing since 1987. These studies center on a mouse model of influenza in which mice are immunized intranasally with inactivated vaccines mixed with a cholera toxin B subunit adjuvant and then infected with mouse-adapted influenza viruses.
(c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Induction of cross-protective immunity against influenza A virus H5N1 by an intranasal vaccine with extracts of mushroom mycelia.J Med Virol. 2010 Jan;82(1):128-37. doi: 10.1002/jmv.21670. J Med Virol. 2010. PMID: 19950232
-
Cross-protection against influenza virus infection afforded by trivalent inactivated vaccines inoculated intranasally with cholera toxin B subunit.J Immunol. 1992 Aug 1;149(3):981-8. J Immunol. 1992. PMID: 1634780
-
Protective immunity against influenza H5N1 virus challenge in mice by intranasal co-administration of baculovirus surface-displayed HA and recombinant CTB as an adjuvant.Virology. 2008 Oct 25;380(2):412-20. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2008.08.002. Epub 2008 Sep 10. Virology. 2008. PMID: 18786689
-
Mechanisms of broad cross-protection provided by influenza virus infection and their application to vaccines.Jpn J Infect Dis. 2005 Aug;58(4):195-207. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2005. PMID: 16116250 Review.
-
Intranasal Inactivated Influenza Vaccines: a Reasonable Approach to Improve the Efficacy of Influenza Vaccine?Jpn J Infect Dis. 2016;69(3):165-79. doi: 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2015.560. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2016. PMID: 27212584 Review.
Cited by
-
Endocine™, N3OA and N3OASq; three mucosal adjuvants that enhance the immune response to nasal influenza vaccination.PLoS One. 2013 Aug 8;8(8):e70527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070527. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23950951 Free PMC article.
-
Mucosal vaccines: novel strategies and applications for the control of pathogens and tumors at mucosal sites.Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014;10(8):2175-87. doi: 10.4161/hv.29269. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014. PMID: 25424921 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Intranasal immunization with a formalin-inactivated human influenza A virus whole-virion vaccine alone and intranasal immunization with a split-virion vaccine with mucosal adjuvants show similar levels of cross-protection.Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012 Jul;19(7):979-90. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00016-12. Epub 2012 May 2. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012. PMID: 22552600 Free PMC article.
-
Relationship of the quaternary structure of human secretory IgA to neutralization of influenza virus.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jun 23;112(25):7809-14. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1503885112. Epub 2015 Jun 8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015. PMID: 26056267 Free PMC article.
-
How to assess the effectiveness of nasal influenza vaccines? Role and measurement of sIgA in mucosal secretions.Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2019 Sep;13(5):429-437. doi: 10.1111/irv.12664. Epub 2019 Jun 21. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2019. PMID: 31225704 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous