Processed meat and colorectal cancer: a quantitative review of prospective epidemiologic studies
- PMID: 20495462
- DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32833b48fa
Processed meat and colorectal cancer: a quantitative review of prospective epidemiologic studies
Abstract
A tremendous amount of scientific interest has been generated regarding processed meat consumption and cancer risk. Therefore, to estimate the association between processed meat intake and colorectal cancer (CRC), a meta-analysis of prospective studies was conducted. Twenty-eight prospective studies of processed meat and CRC were identified, of which 20 represented independent nonoverlapping study populations. Summary relative risk estimates (SRREs) for high versus low intake and dose-response relationships were calculated. The SRRE for high (vs. low) processed meat intake and CRC was 1.16 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10-1.23] for all studies. Summary associations were modified considerably by sex; the SRRE for men was 1.23 (95% CI: 1.07-1.42) and the SRRE for women was 1.05 (95% CI: 0.94-1.16), based on nine and 13 studies, respectively. Sensitivity analyses did not indicate appreciable statistical variation by tumor site, processed meat groups, or study location. The SRRE for each 30-gram increment of processed meat and CRC was 1.10 (95% CI: 1.05-1.15) based on nine studies, and the SRRE for each incremental serving of processed meat per week was 1.03 (95% CI: 1.01-1.05) based on six studies. Overall, summary associations were weak in magnitude (i.e. most less than 1.20), processed meat definitions and analytical comparisons were highly variable across studies, and isolating the independent effects of processed meat intake is difficult, given the likely influence of confounding by other dietary and lifestyle factors. Therefore, the currently available epidemiologic evidence is not sufficient to support a clear and unequivocal independent positive association between processed meat consumption and CRC.
Similar articles
-
Meta-analysis of prospective studies of red meat consumption and colorectal cancer.Eur J Cancer Prev. 2011 Jul;20(4):293-307. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e328345f985. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2011. PMID: 21540747
-
A review and meta-analysis of red and processed meat consumption and breast cancer.Nutr Res Rev. 2010 Dec;23(2):349-65. doi: 10.1017/S0954422410000235. Nutr Res Rev. 2010. PMID: 21110906 Review.
-
Quantitative assessment of red meat or processed meat consumption and kidney cancer.Cancer Detect Prev. 2009;32(5-6):340-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cdp.2009.02.002. Epub 2009 Mar 19. Cancer Detect Prev. 2009. PMID: 19303221 Review.
-
Red meat and colorectal cancer: a critical summary of prospective epidemiologic studies.Obes Rev. 2011 May;12(5):e472-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00785.x. Obes Rev. 2011. PMID: 20663065 Review.
-
Processed meat consumption and stomach cancer risk: a meta-analysis.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Aug 2;98(15):1078-87. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj301. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006. PMID: 16882945
Cited by
-
Low-Fat Dietary Pattern and Cancer Mortality in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Randomized Controlled Trial.JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2019 Jan 7;2(4):pky065. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pky065. eCollection 2018 Oct. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2019. PMID: 31360880 Free PMC article.
-
Diet and supplements and their impact on colorectal cancer.J Gastrointest Oncol. 2013 Dec;4(4):409-23. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2013.003. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2013. PMID: 24294513 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Multiple Gene-Environment Interactions on the Angiogenesis Gene-Pathway Impact Rectal Cancer Risk and Survival.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Sep 28;14(10):1146. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101146. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017. PMID: 28956832 Free PMC article.
-
Processed meat intake and incidence of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies.Eur J Clin Nutr. 2020 Aug;74(8):1132-1148. doi: 10.1038/s41430-020-0576-9. Epub 2020 Feb 6. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2020. PMID: 32029911
-
Red and processed meat and colorectal cancer incidence: meta-analysis of prospective studies.PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20456. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020456. Epub 2011 Jun 6. PLoS One. 2011. PMID: 21674008 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical