Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar;12(2):115-22.
doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00145.x.

Escalating computed tomography angiogram (CTA) grade predicts unresectability and margin status for pancreaticobiliary neoplasms

Affiliations

Escalating computed tomography angiogram (CTA) grade predicts unresectability and margin status for pancreaticobiliary neoplasms

Tara S Kent et al. HPB (Oxford). 2010 Mar.

Abstract

Background and aims: The Raptopoulos computed tomography (CT) grading system of pancreaticobiliary cancers was conceived to predict resectability based on tumour involvement of critical vasculature. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between CT grade, resectability, margin status and survival after pancreatic resection.

Methods: Patients with presumed pancreaticobiliary malignancy and a pancreas protocol computed tomography angiogram (CTA) who underwent attempted curative resection from October 2001 and August 2008 were identified. The relationship between radiographical involvement of critical vasculature, according to a five-point scale, and ultimate resectability, margin status and survival was assessed.

Results: Overall, 276 (70.2%) out of 393 patients were resectable. The proportion of patients who were unresectable at laparotomy increased as CT grade escalated; 41/250 (16.4%) CT Grade 0, 16/55 (29.1%) CT Grade 1, 33/55 (60%) CT Grade 2, 27/33 CT Grade 3, P < 0.001. Local invasion or vascular involvement was the reason for unresectability in 14/41, 12/16, 23/33, 16/27 patients with CT Grade 0-3, respectively. A R0 resection was achieved in 84/131 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and varied significantly by CT grade, P= 0.021. Significant predictors of survival were age (P < 0.0001), resectability (P < 0.0001) and diagnosis (P < 0.009).

Conclusions: Escalating Raptopoulos CT grade is correlated with increasing probability of unresectability and R1 resection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Raptopoulos computed tomography (CT) grading system for Pancreaticobiliary Neoplasms. (A) Grade 0: no vascular involvement with interposition of either pancreatic parenchyma or fat between the vessel and the tumour. (B) Grade 1: loss of the fat plane between the tumour and vessel without vessel distortion. (C) Grade 2: slight flattening or indentation of vessel, or surrounding up to 2/3 the vessel perimeter. (D) Grade 3: tumour extends around at least 2/3 of the vessel perimeter, changing its contour and narrowing the lumen; sometimes referred to as the ‘teardrop sign’. (E) Grade 4: occlusion or obliteration of vessel without option for reconstruction

References

    1. Raptopoulos V, Steer ML, Sheiman RG, Vrachliotis TG, Gougoutas CA, Movson JS. The use of helical CT and CT angiography to predict vascular involvement from pancreatic cancer: correlation with findings at surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168:971–977. - PubMed
    1. Saldinger PF, Reilly M, Reynolds K, Raptopoulos V, Chuttani R, Steer ML, et al. Is CT angiography sufficient for prediction of resectability of periampullary neoplasms? J Gastrointest Surg. 2000;4:233–237. - PubMed
    1. House MG, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, Schulick RD, Leach SD, et al. Predicting resectability of periampullary cancer with three-dimensional computed tomography. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8:280–288. - PubMed
    1. Zamboni GA, Kruskal JB, Vollmer CM, Baptista J, Callery MP, Raptopoulos VD. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: value of multidetector CT angiography in preoperative evaluation. Radiology. 2007;245:770–778. - PubMed
    1. Callery MP, Chang KJ, Fishman EK, Talamonti MS, Traverso LW, Linehan DC. Pretreatment assessment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreas cancer: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1727–1733. - PubMed

MeSH terms