Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Jun;35(6):809-15.
doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1042-4. Epub 2010 May 21.

Accuracy of acetabular cup placement in computer-assisted, minimally-invasive THR in a lateral decubitus position

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Accuracy of acetabular cup placement in computer-assisted, minimally-invasive THR in a lateral decubitus position

Ernst Sendtner et al. Int Orthop. 2011 Jun.

Abstract

In a prospective and randomised clinical study, we implanted acetabular cups either by means of an image-free computer-navigation system (navigated group, n = 32) or by free-hand technique (freehand group n = 32, two drop-outs). Total hip replacement was conducted in the lateral position and through a minimally invasive anterior approach (MicroHip). The position of the component was determined postoperatively on CT scans of the pelvis using CT-planning software. We found an average inclination of 42.3° (range 32.7-50.6°; SD ± 3.8°) and an average anteversion of 24.5° (range 12.0-33.3°; SD ± 6.0°) in the computer-assisted study group and an average inclination of 37.9° (range 25.6-50.2°; SD ± 6.3°) and an average anteversion of 23.8° (range 5.6-46.9°; SD ± 10.1°) in the freehand group. The higher precision of computer navigation was indicated by the lower standard deviations. For both measurements we found a significant heterogeneity of variances (p < 0.05, Levene's test). The mean difference between the cup inclination/anteversion values displayed by computer navigation and the true cup position (CT control) was 0.37° (SD 3.26) and -5.61° (SD 6.48), respectively. We found a bias (underestimation) with regard to anteversion determined by the imageless computer navigation system. A bias for inclination was not found. Registration of the landmarks of the anterior pelvic plane in lateral position with undraped percutaneous methods leads to an error in cup anteversion, but not to an error in cup inclination. The bias we found is consistent with a correct registration of the anterosuperior iliac spine (ASIS) and with a registration of the symphysis 1 cm above the bone, corresponding to the less compressible overlying soft tissue in this region. There was no significant correlation between the bias and the thickness of soft tissue above the pubic tubercles. We suggest use of a percutaneous registration of ASIS and an invasive registration above the pubic tubercles when computer-assisted navigation is performed in minimally invasive THR in a lateral position.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Inclination of the acetabular component following freehand and navigation. Levene's test for homogeneity of variances, p = 0.007
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Anteversion of the acetabular component following freehand and navigation. Levene's test for homogeneity of variances, p = 0.024
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Inclination: deviation of the navigation values to CT values compared to their mean. Dotted lines represent the 95% limits of agreement (Bland-Altman graph)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Anteversion: deviation of the navigation values to CT values compared to their mean. Dotted lines represent the 95% limits of agreement (Bland-Altman graph)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Soft tissue thickness overlying a the pubic tubercles (PT) and b the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) measured in axial CT images. Soft tissue overlying ASIS potentially contains abdominal wall and bowel structures

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jolles BM, Genoud P, Hoffmeyer P. Computer-assisted cup placement techniques in total hip arthroplasty improve accuracy of placement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;426:174–179. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000141903.08075.83. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nogler M, Kessler O, Prassl A, Donnelly B, Streicher R, Sledge JB, Krismer M. Reduced variability of acetabular cup positioning with use of an imageless navigation system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;426:159–163. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000141902.30946.6d. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kalteis T, Handel M, Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Grifka J. Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: is it as accurate as CT-based navigation? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:163–167. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B2.17163. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gandhi R, Marchie A, Farrokhyar F, Mahomed N. Computer navigation in total hip replacement: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop. 2009;33(3):593–597. doi: 10.1007/s00264-008-0539-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dorr LD, Malik A, Wan Z, Long WT, Harris M. Precision and bias of imageless computer navigation and surgeon estimates for acetabular component position. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;465:92–99. - PubMed

Publication types