Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Jun;40(6):501-6.
doi: 10.1007/s00595-009-4153-z. Epub 2010 May 23.

Resection of rectal cancer: a historical review

Affiliations
Review

Resection of rectal cancer: a historical review

Yasuhiro Inoue et al. Surg Today. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Local control of rectal cancer and patient survival have improved remarkably with advances in surgical techniques and adjuvant therapy. By applying advanced surgical principles, surgeons can now excise most rectal cancers completely, often preserving the anal sphincter and leaving the patient with relatively normal bowel and pelvic function. Historically, the earliest surgical approaches to rectal cancer were via the perineum. As surgical techniques and general anesthesia improved, other approaches such as a posterior approach were undertaken to improve access to the whole rectum. Consequently, abdominoperineal resection became the standard treatment until anterior resection was introduced for proximal rectal cancers. The most important surgical breakthrough in recent years has been the advent of total mesorectal excision (TME). The emphasis in rectal cancer surgery is on preservation of function, with dissection being done in appropriate anatomical planes. Thus, mobilization of the rectum has a long history, and is seen in modern procedures including TME and intersphincter resection. This article reviews the progression of the surgical management of rectal cancer with reference to historical perspectives. We discuss the major surgical considerations for mobilization of the rectum in several surgical procedures, from conventional operations to modern standardized TME.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Cleve Clin Q. 1961 Apr;28:109-15 - PubMed
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1980 Apr;23(3):202-5 - PubMed
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997 Dec;40(12):1409-13 - PubMed
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1980 Sep;23(6):432-41 - PubMed
    1. Anat Sci Int. 2007 Mar;82(1):8-15 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources