Complications associated with revision of Sprint Fidelis leads: report from the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Advisory Committee
- PMID: 20497979
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.924357
Complications associated with revision of Sprint Fidelis leads: report from the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Advisory Committee
Abstract
Background: It has been observed that replacement of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator generator in response to a device advisory may be associated with a substantial rate of complications, including death. The risk of lead revision in response to a lead advisory has not been determined previously.
Methods and results: Twenty-five implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation and follow-up centers from the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Advisory Committee were surveyed to assess complication rates as a result of lead revisions due to the Sprint Fidelis advisory issued in October 2007. As of June 1, 2009, there had been 310 lead failures found in 6237 Sprint Fidelis leads in Canada (4.97%) over a follow-up of 40 months. There were 469 leads to be revised, 66% for confirmed fracture. Of the patients who underwent revision, 95% had a new lead inserted, whereas 4% had a pace/sense lead added. The lead was removed in 248 cases (53%), by simple traction in 61% and by laser lead extraction in 33%. Complications were encountered in 14.5% of the lead revisions; 7.25% of these were major, whereas 7.25% were minor. There were 2 deaths (0.43%). The overall risk of complications (19.8%) was greater in those who underwent lead removal at the time of revision than in those whose leads were abandoned (8.6%; P=0.0008).
Conclusions: The overall rate of major complications that arose from lead revision due to the Sprint Fidelis advisory was significant. This must be taken into account when lead revision is planned in those patients who have not yet demonstrated an abnormality in lead performance.
Comment in
-
Letter by Maytin and Epstein et al regarding article, "Complications associated with revision of Sprint Fidelis leads: report from the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Advisory Committee".Circulation. 2011 Mar 15;123(10):e375. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.972851. Circulation. 2011. PMID: 21403121 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Letter by Maytin and Epstein et al regarding article, "Complications associated with revision of Sprint Fidelis leads: report from the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Advisory Committee".Circulation. 2011 Mar 15;123(10):e375. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.972851. Circulation. 2011. PMID: 21403121 No abstract available.
-
Outcome of the Fidelis implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead advisory: a report from the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Advisory Committee.Heart Rhythm. 2008 May;5(5):639-42. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.01.029. Epub 2008 Jan 29. Heart Rhythm. 2008. PMID: 18452862
-
Biventricular defibrillator patients have higher complication rates after revision of recalled leads.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Jun;35(6):665-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03401.x. Epub 2012 Apr 22. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012. PMID: 22519559
-
Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society position paper on implantable cardioverter defibrillator use in Canada.Can J Cardiol. 2005 May;21 Suppl A:11A-18A. Can J Cardiol. 2005. PMID: 15953939 Review.
-
Should recent defibrillator and lead advisories affect decisions to refer patients for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy?Curr Opin Cardiol. 2010 Jan;25(1):23-8. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e328333d375. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 19907318 Review.
Cited by
-
A Policy Approach to Reducing Low-Value Device-Based Procedure Use.Milbank Q. 2022 Dec;100(4):1006-1027. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12595. Epub 2022 Dec 27. Milbank Q. 2022. PMID: 36573334 Free PMC article.
-
Seal plug damage causing inappropriate detection and therapy in a subcutaneous defibrillator system.HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2018 Aug 28;5(2):66-69. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2018.02.013. eCollection 2019 Feb. HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2018. PMID: 30820398 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Managing patients with advisory defibrillator leads: what can we learn from published data?Neth Heart J. 2015 Apr;23(4):199-204. doi: 10.1007/s12471-015-0669-6. Neth Heart J. 2015. PMID: 25884090 Free PMC article.
-
Riata lead up to date.J Cardiol Cases. 2017 Feb 1;15(2):70-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jccase.2016.10.017. eCollection 2017 Feb. J Cardiol Cases. 2017. PMID: 30546700 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Dual- versus single-coil implantable defibrillator leads: review of the literature.Clin Res Cardiol. 2012 Apr;101(4):239-45. doi: 10.1007/s00392-011-0407-z. Epub 2012 Jan 10. Clin Res Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 22231644 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials