Influence of nodule detection software on radiologists' confidence in identifying pulmonary nodules with computed tomography
- PMID: 20498624
- PMCID: PMC3119348
- DOI: 10.1097/RTI.0b013e3181d73a8f
Influence of nodule detection software on radiologists' confidence in identifying pulmonary nodules with computed tomography
Abstract
Purpose: With advances in technology, detection of small pulmonary nodules is increasing. Nodule detection software (NDS) has been developed to assist radiologists with pulmonary nodule diagnosis. Although it may increase sensitivity for small nodules, often there is an accompanying increase in false-positive findings. We designed a study to examine the extent to which computed tomography (CT) NDS influences the confidence of radiologists in identifying small pulmonary nodules.
Materials and methods: Eight radiologists (readers) with different levels of experience examined thoracic CT scans of 131 cases and identified all the clinically relevant pulmonary nodules. The reference standard was established by an expert, dedicated thoracic radiologist. For each nodule, the readers recorded nodule size, density, location, and confidence level. Two weeks (or more) later, the readers reinterpreted the same scans; however, this time they were provided marks, when present, as indicated by NDS and asked to reassess their level of confidence. The effect of NDS on changes in reader confidence was assessed using multivariable generalized linear regression models.
Results: A total of 327 unique nodules were identified. Declines in confidence were significantly (P<0.05) associated with the absence of an NDS mark and smaller nodules (odds ratio=71.0, 95% confidence interval =14.8-339.7). Among nodules with pre-NDS confidence less than 100%, increases in confidence were significantly (P<0.05) associated with the presence of an NDS mark (odds ratio=6.0, 95% confidence interval =2.7-13.6) and larger nodules. Secondary findings showed that NDS did not improve reader diagnostic accuracy.
Conclusion: Although in this study NDS does not seem to enhance reader accuracy, the confidence of the radiologists in identifying small pulmonary nodules with CT is greatly influenced by NDS.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) software for the detection of lung nodules on multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT): JAFROC study for the improvement in radiologists' diagnostic accuracy.Acad Radiol. 2008 Dec;15(12):1505-12. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.06.009. Acad Radiol. 2008. PMID: 19000867
-
Software with artificial intelligence-derived algorithms for detecting and analysing lung nodules in CT scans: systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(14):1-234. doi: 10.3310/JYTW8921. Health Technol Assess. 2025. PMID: 40380885 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of CAD on radiologists' detection of lung nodules on thoracic CT scans: analysis of an observer performance study by nodule size.Acad Radiol. 2009 Dec;16(12):1518-30. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.08.006. Acad Radiol. 2009. PMID: 19896069 Free PMC article.
-
[The performance of digital chest radiographs in the detection and diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and the consistency among readers].Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2023 Mar 23;45(3):265-272. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20220304-00150. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2023. PMID: 36944548 Chinese.
-
Lung nodule and cancer detection in computed tomography screening.J Thorac Imaging. 2015 Mar;30(2):130-8. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000140. J Thorac Imaging. 2015. PMID: 25658477 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Missed cancers in lung cancer screening--more than meets the eye.Eur Radiol. 2015 Jan;25(1):89-91. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3395-3. Epub 2014 Sep 5. Eur Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25189153
-
A Systematic Review of AI Performance in Lung Cancer Detection on CT Thorax.Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 24;13(13):1510. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131510. Healthcare (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40648536 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Is confidence of mammographic assessment a good predictor of accuracy?AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Jul;199(1):W134-41. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7701. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012. PMID: 22733922 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The impact of trained radiographers as concurrent readers on performance and reading time of experienced radiologists in the UK Lung Cancer Screening (UKLS) trial.Eur Radiol. 2018 Jan;28(1):226-234. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4903-z. Epub 2017 Jun 22. Eur Radiol. 2018. PMID: 28643093 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Shiau MC, Bonavita J, Naidich DP. Adenocarcinoma of the lung: current concepts in radiologic diagnosis and management. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2007;13:261–266. - PubMed
-
- Hirose T, Nitta N, Shiraishi J, et al. Evaluation of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) software for the detection of lung nodules on multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT): JAFROC study for the improvement in radiologists’ diagnostic accuracy. Acad Radiol. 2008;15:1505–1512. - PubMed
-
- Awai K, Murao K, Ozawa A, et al. Pulmonary nodules at chest CT: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologists’ detection performance. Radiology. 2004;230:347–352. - PubMed
-
- White CS, Pugatch R, Koonce T, et al. Lung nodule CAD software as a second reader: a multicenter study. Acad Radiol. 2008;15:326–333. - PubMed
-
- Rubin GD, Lyo JK, Paik DS, et al. Pulmonary nodules on multi-detector row CT scans: performance comparison of radiologists and computer-aided detection. Radiology. 2005;234:274–283. - PubMed