Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb;40(1):25-32.
doi: 10.5051/jpis.2010.40.1.25. Epub 2010 Feb 28.

A radiographical study on the changes in height of grafting materials after sinus lift: a comparison between two types of xenogenic materials

Affiliations

A radiographical study on the changes in height of grafting materials after sinus lift: a comparison between two types of xenogenic materials

Pham-Duong Hieu et al. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: The performance of implant surgery in the posterior maxilla often poses a challenge due to insufficient available bone. Sinus floor elevation was developed to increase the needed vertical height to overcome this problem. However, grafting materials used for the sinus lift technique eventually show resorption. The present study radiographically compared and evaluated the changes in height of the grafting materials after carrying out maxillary sinus elevation with a window opening procedure. This study also evaluated the difference between two xenogenic bone materials when being used for the sinus lifting procedure.

Methods: Twenty-one patients were recruited for this study and underwent a sinus lift procedure. All sites were treated with either bovine bone (Bio-Oss(R)) with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or bovine bone (OCS-B(R))/PRP. A total of 69 implants were placed equally 6-8 months after the sinus lift. All sites were clinically and radiographically evaluated right after the implant surgery, 7-12 months, 13-24 months, and 25-48 months after their prosthetic loading.

Results: Changes of implant length/bone length with time showed a statistically significant decreasing tendency (P < 0.05). There was no significant change in the Bio-Oss(R) group (P > 0.05). In contrast, the OCS-B(R) group showed a significant decrease with time (P < 0.05). However, no significant difference was observed between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: The results showed that there was significant reduction in comparison with data right after placement, after 7 to 12 months, 13 to 24 months, and over 25 months; however, reduction rates between each period have shown to be without significance. No significant difference in height change was observed between the Bio-Oss(R) and the OCS-B(R) groups.

Keywords: Bone substitutes; Maxillary sinus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagram for the measurement of bone level and height. IL: implant length, BL: bone level.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Statical analysis of BL/IL as time passed. BL: bone level, IL: implant length.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Statically analysis of each group as time passed.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Statical analysis between groups as time passed.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Branemark PI, Jemt T. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990;5:347–359. - PubMed
    1. Albrektsson T, Dahl E, Enbom L, Engevall S, Engquist B, Eriksson AR, et al. Osseointegrated oral implants: a Swedish multicenter study of 8139 consecutively inserted Nobelpharma implants. J Periodontol. 1988;59:287–296. - PubMed
    1. Chanavaz M. Maxillary sinus: anatomy, physiology, surgery, and bone grafting related to implantology: eleven years of surgical experience (1979-1990) J Oral Implantol. 1990;16:199–209. - PubMed
    1. Rosen MD, Sarnat BG. Change of volume of the maxillary sinus of the dog after extraction of adjacent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1955;8:420–429. - PubMed
    1. Tatum H., Jr Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am. 1986;30:207–229. - PubMed