A radiographical study on the changes in height of grafting materials after sinus lift: a comparison between two types of xenogenic materials
- PMID: 20498756
- PMCID: PMC2872804
- DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2010.40.1.25
A radiographical study on the changes in height of grafting materials after sinus lift: a comparison between two types of xenogenic materials
Abstract
Purpose: The performance of implant surgery in the posterior maxilla often poses a challenge due to insufficient available bone. Sinus floor elevation was developed to increase the needed vertical height to overcome this problem. However, grafting materials used for the sinus lift technique eventually show resorption. The present study radiographically compared and evaluated the changes in height of the grafting materials after carrying out maxillary sinus elevation with a window opening procedure. This study also evaluated the difference between two xenogenic bone materials when being used for the sinus lifting procedure.
Methods: Twenty-one patients were recruited for this study and underwent a sinus lift procedure. All sites were treated with either bovine bone (Bio-Oss(R)) with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or bovine bone (OCS-B(R))/PRP. A total of 69 implants were placed equally 6-8 months after the sinus lift. All sites were clinically and radiographically evaluated right after the implant surgery, 7-12 months, 13-24 months, and 25-48 months after their prosthetic loading.
Results: Changes of implant length/bone length with time showed a statistically significant decreasing tendency (P < 0.05). There was no significant change in the Bio-Oss(R) group (P > 0.05). In contrast, the OCS-B(R) group showed a significant decrease with time (P < 0.05). However, no significant difference was observed between the two groups (P > 0.05).
Conclusions: The results showed that there was significant reduction in comparison with data right after placement, after 7 to 12 months, 13 to 24 months, and over 25 months; however, reduction rates between each period have shown to be without significance. No significant difference in height change was observed between the Bio-Oss(R) and the OCS-B(R) groups.
Keywords: Bone substitutes; Maxillary sinus.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Comparison of two anorganic bovine bone in maxillary sinus lift: a split-mouth study with clinical, radiographical, and histomorphometrical analysis.Int J Implant Dent. 2020 May 6;6(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00214-w. Int J Implant Dent. 2020. PMID: 32372226 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of sinus floor elevation using a composite bone graft mixture.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Jun;18(3):376-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01337.x. Epub 2007 Mar 12. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007. PMID: 17355356
-
Sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone vs. a bovine-derived xenograft - a 5-year retrospective study.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Jun;26(6):644-8. doi: 10.1111/clr.12352. Epub 2014 Feb 20. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015. PMID: 25906198
-
A comparison of two techniques to augment maxillary sinuses using the lateral window approach: rigid synthetic resorbable barriers versus anorganic bovine bone. Five-month post-loading clinical and histological results of a pilot randomised controlled clinical trial.Eur J Oral Implantol. 2009 Winter;2(4):293-306. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2009. PMID: 20467605 Clinical Trial.
-
Implants in the Posterior Maxilla: Open Sinus Lift Versus Conventional Implant Placement. A Systematic Review.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 July/August;34(4):e65–e76. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7274. Epub 2019 Feb 26. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019. PMID: 30807622
Cited by
-
Tissue Level Changes after Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation with Three Types of Calcium Phosphate Ceramics: A Radiological Study with a 5-Year Follow-Up.Materials (Basel). 2021 Mar 17;14(6):1471. doi: 10.3390/ma14061471. Materials (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33802924 Free PMC article.
-
Bone Tissue Engineering in the Treatment of Bone Defects.Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022 Jul 17;15(7):879. doi: 10.3390/ph15070879. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35890177 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus augmentation.J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2018 Jun 28;48(3):174-181. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2018.48.3.174. eCollection 2018 Jun. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2018. PMID: 29984047 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Anorganic Bovine Bone (Bio-Oss) and Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite (Ostim) in Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation.Int Sch Res Notices. 2014 Oct 29;2014:967091. doi: 10.1155/2014/967091. eCollection 2014. Int Sch Res Notices. 2014. PMID: 27382621 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review of a novel alloplast carbonate apatite granules.Front Dent Med. 2024 Aug 16;5:1418039. doi: 10.3389/fdmed.2024.1418039. eCollection 2024. Front Dent Med. 2024. PMID: 39917693 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Branemark PI, Jemt T. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990;5:347–359. - PubMed
-
- Albrektsson T, Dahl E, Enbom L, Engevall S, Engquist B, Eriksson AR, et al. Osseointegrated oral implants: a Swedish multicenter study of 8139 consecutively inserted Nobelpharma implants. J Periodontol. 1988;59:287–296. - PubMed
-
- Chanavaz M. Maxillary sinus: anatomy, physiology, surgery, and bone grafting related to implantology: eleven years of surgical experience (1979-1990) J Oral Implantol. 1990;16:199–209. - PubMed
-
- Rosen MD, Sarnat BG. Change of volume of the maxillary sinus of the dog after extraction of adjacent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1955;8:420–429. - PubMed
-
- Tatum H., Jr Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am. 1986;30:207–229. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials