Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 May 25:9:26.
doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-9-26.

Neighborhood deprivation, vehicle ownership, and potential spatial access to a variety of fruits and vegetables in a large rural area in Texas

Joseph R Sharkey  1 , Scott Horel, Wesley R Dean
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Neighborhood deprivation, vehicle ownership, and potential spatial access to a variety of fruits and vegetables in a large rural area in Texas

Joseph R Sharkey et al. Int J Health Geogr. .

Abstract

Objective: There has been limited study of all types of food stores, such as traditional (supercenters, supermarkets, and grocery stores), convenience stores, and non-traditional (dollar stores, mass merchandisers, and pharmacies) as potential opportunities for purchase of fresh and processed (canned and frozen) fruits and vegetables, especially in small-town or rural areas.

Methods: Data from the Brazos Valley Food Environment Project (BVFEP) are combined with 2000 U.S. Census data for 101 Census block groups (CBG) to examine neighborhood access to fruits and vegetables. BVFEP data included identification and geocoding of all food stores (n = 185) in six rural counties in Texas, using ground-truthed methods and on-site assessment of the availability and variety of fresh and processed fruits and vegetables in all food stores. Access from the population-weighted centroid of each CBG was measured using proximity (minimum network distance) and coverage (number of shopping opportunities) for a good selection of fresh and processed fruits and vegetables. Neighborhood inequalities (deprivation and vehicle ownership) and spatial access for fruits and vegetables were examined using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test and multivariate regression models.

Results: The variety of fruits or vegetables was greater at supermarkets compared with grocery stores. Among non-traditional and convenience food stores, the largest variety was found at dollar stores. On average, rural neighborhoods were 9.9 miles to the nearest supermarket, 6.7 miles and 7.4 miles to the nearest food store with a good variety of fresh fruits and vegetables, respectively, and 4.7 miles and 4.5 miles to a good variety of fresh and processed fruits or vegetables. High deprivation or low vehicle ownership neighborhoods had better spatial access to a good variety of fruits and vegetables, both in the distance to the nearest source and in the number of shopping opportunities.

Conclusion: Supermarkets and grocery stores are no longer the only shopping opportunities for fruits or vegetables. The inclusion of data on availability of fresh or processed fruits or vegetables in the measurements provides robust meaning to the concept of potential access in this large rural area.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptual Model of Food Access.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Map of Texas and Brazos Valley Counties.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Area-level (CBG) Deprivation and Access to Fresh Fruit.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Area-level Deprivation and Access to Fresh Vegetables.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Area-level Vehicle Ownership and Access to Fresh Fruit.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Area-level Vehicle Ownership and Access to Fresh Vegetables.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Area-level Deprivation and Access to Fresh and Processed Fruit.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Area-level Deprivation and Access to Fresh and Processed Vegetables.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Area-level Vehicle Ownership and Access to Fresh and Processed Fruit.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Area-level Vehicle Ownership and Access to Fresh and Processed Vegetables.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture. Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2005. 2005. http://www.health.gov/dietaryguidelines/dga2005/document/pdf/DGA2005.pdf [cited 2005 January 14]
    1. VanDuyn MA, Pivonka E. Overview of the health benefits of fruit and vegetable consumption for the dietetics professional: selected literature. J Am Diet Assoc. 2000;100:1511–21. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(00)00420-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ness AR, Powles JW. Fruit and vegetables, and cardiovascular disease: a review. Int J Epidemiol. 1997;26:1–13. doi: 10.1093/ije/26.1.1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Steinmetz KA, Potter JD. Vegetables, fruit, and cancer prevention: a review. J Am Diet Assoc. 1996;96:1027–39. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(96)00273-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Serdula MK, Byers T, Mokdad AH, Simoes E, Mendlein JM, Coates RJ. The association between fruit and vegetable intake and chronic disease risk factors. Epidemiology. 1996;7:161–5. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199603000-00010. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms