Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010;116(1):c53-9.
doi: 10.1159/000314663. Epub 2010 May 21.

Utilization and outcome of 'out-of-center hemodialysis' in the United States: a contemporary analysis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Utilization and outcome of 'out-of-center hemodialysis' in the United States: a contemporary analysis

Jennifer M MacRae et al. Nephron Clin Pract. 2010.

Abstract

Background: There is increasing interest in the delivery of out-of-center hemodialysis (HD), particularly in the home setting, but little systematic information about its use and outcome in contemporary incident patients is available.

Patients and methods: Out-of-center HD was defined as HD delivered in a residential setting, mainly at home or in a long-term care facility (such as a nursing home) irrespective of the length and frequency of therapy. All-cause mortality was determined in an observational cohort study of 458,329 adult patients initiating dialysis in the United States with Medicare as a primary payer.

Results: Between 1995 and 2004, out-of-center HD was the initial modality in 1,641 (0.4%) of eligible participants, although there was significant geographic variation. Patients initiating out-of-center HD were younger, more likely to be nonwhite, had fewer comorbidities, a higher median income, and were more likely to be employed than patients initiating in-center HD or peritoneal dialysis (PD). In multivariate analysis, out-of-center HD patients had a higher overall risk of death compared to in-center HD or PD patients (HR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.04, 1.17), although the relative risk of death was lower in younger and healthier patients (HR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.61, 1.00).

Conclusion: Out-of-center HD is not associated with a survival advantage among unselected patients initiating dialysis in the United States. These results call for better characterization of out-of-center HD in national registries, primarily to effectively compare the use, outcomes and potential benefits of home HD to standard therapies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Map of out-of-center HD rate (per 1,000 incident patients with ESRD initiating dialysis) in the US between 1995 and 2004 stratified by USRDS network.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Cumulative probability of patient survival stratified by initial dialysis modality.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shaldon S. Origin of home haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21:3610–3611. - PubMed
    1. Blagg CR. Home haemodialysis: ‘home, home, sweet, sweet home!’. Nephrology. 2005;10:206–214. - PubMed
    1. Saner E, Nitsch D, Descoeudres C, Frey FJ, Uehlinger DE. Outcome of home haemodialysis patients: a case-cohort study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005;20:604–610. - PubMed
    1. Nesrallah GE, Moist LM, Awaraji C, Lindsay RM. An international registry to compare quotidian dialysis regimens with conventional thrice-weekly hemodialysis: why, how and potential pitfalls. Semin Dial. 2004;17:131–135. - PubMed
    1. Kjellstrand CM, Buoncristiani U, Ting G, Traeger J, Piccoli GB, Sibai-Galland R, Young BA, Blagg CR. Short daily haemodialysis: survival in 415 patients treated for 1006 patient-years. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008;23:3283–3289. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms