Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2010 Nov;18(11):1367-76.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0904-z. Epub 2010 May 26.

The effects of resistance training on quality of life in cancer: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The effects of resistance training on quality of life in cancer: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Fiona Cramp et al. Support Care Cancer. 2010 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of resistance training upon quality of life (QoL) in cancer.

Search strategy: A wide range of electronic databases were searched from inception to October 2009 using relevant key words. Reference lists of all studies identified for inclusion and relevant reviews were also searched. Relevant journals were hand searched and experts in the field contacted.

Selection criteria: Randomized controlled trials that investigated the specific effect of resistance training on QoL in adult cancer survivors were included.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data based upon predefined criteria. A meta-analysis was performed for QoL using a random effects model.

Results: Six studies were identified for inclusion. Two studies demonstrated a significantly beneficial effect of resistance training on QoL compared to usual care. Post-test means ± standard deviations were available for all comparisons providing data for 278 participants who received a resistance training intervention and 270 control participants. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated that, at the end of the intervention period, resistance training was statistically more effective than the control intervention (SMD -0.17, 95% CIs -0.34 to -0.00). Overall, there was heterogeneity between studies in relation to tumor type, stage of cancer treatment, type of cancer treatment, and duration of the intervention.

Conclusions: Existing evidence suggests that strength training programs for cancer survivors have marginal benefit. Further, fully powered studies are required to determine the optimal type, intensity, and timing of resistance training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jun 1;23(16):3830-42 - PubMed
    1. Head Neck. 2004 Jun;26(6):518-30 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Nurs. 2008 Sep-Oct;31(5):354-60; quiz 361-2 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jan 20;27(3):344-51 - PubMed
    1. J Soc Integr Oncol. 2008 Spring;6(2):76-81 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources