Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2010 Jun;21(2):96-101.
doi: 10.1007/s00399-010-0075-0.

[ICD therapy as secondary prevention]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

[ICD therapy as secondary prevention]

[Article in German]
K Seidl et al. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Patients who survive out-of-hospital cardiac arrest or symptomatic ventricular tachyarrhythmias are at considerable risk of recurrence of these events and ultimately death. The implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in patients with previous sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT) is considered secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death. The purpose of this review is to summarize the most important trials on secondary prevention with an ICD. The results from a meta-analysis showed a relative-risk reduction of 28% in overall mortality. Compared with amiodarone, an ICD provided maximal benefit for those patients with an ejection fraction between 20% and 35%. The results of the ICD trial demonstrate that there is clear evidence for the effectiveness of an ICD in patients with unstable VT; however, for patients with stable VT the results are less clear. Data on older patients are scant, and whether the survival benefit observed in the middle aged and younger-old also extend to older elderly patients with a more limited life span is less clear. Therefore, as the population becomes older, it is important to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and the cost effectiveness of ICD implantation in this population. Guidelines are important and helpful to guide clinical decisions, but the indication for an ICD still remains an individual decision after evaluation of the risks and benefits for the individual patient. However, the patient needs to be involved, which emphasizes the importance of dialogue between the patient and physician.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Clin Res Cardiol. 2006 Dec;95(12):696-708 - PubMed
    1. Internist (Berl). 2006 Oct;47(10):1040, 1042-9 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 2001 Jan 16;103(2):244-52 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 2010 Jan 2;375(9708):31-40 - PubMed
    1. Br Heart J. 1995 Feb;73(2):158-63 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources