Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 May 27:11:67.
doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-67.

The Viborg Vascular (VIVA) screening trial of 65-74 year old men in the central region of Denmark: study protocol

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The Viborg Vascular (VIVA) screening trial of 65-74 year old men in the central region of Denmark: study protocol

Nikolaj Grøndal et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) of men aged 65-74 years reduces the AAA-related mortality and is generally considered cost effective. Despite of this only a few national health care services have implemented permanent programs. Around 10% of men in this group have peripheral arterial disease (PAD) defined by an ankle brachial systolic blood pressure index (ABI) below 0.9 resulting in an increased mortality-rate of 25-30%. In addition well-documented health benefits may be achieved through primary prophylaxis by initiating systematic cholesterol-lowering, smoking cessation, low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (aspirins), exercise, a healthy diet and blood-pressure control altogether reducing the increased risks for cardiovascular disease by at least 20-25%. The benefits of combining screening for AAA and PAD seem evident; yet they remain to be established. The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and the cost-effectiveness of a combined screening program for AAA, PAD and hypertension.

Methods: The Viborg Vascular (VIVA) screening trial is a randomized, clinically controlled study designed to evaluate the benefits of vascular screening and modern vascular prophylaxis in a population of 50,000 men aged 65-74 years. Enrolment started October 2008 and is expected to stop in October 2010. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes are cardiovascular mortality, AAA-related mortality, hospital services related to cardiovascular conditions, prevalence of AAA, PAD and potentially undiagnosed hypertension, health-related quality of life and cost effectiveness. Data analysis by intention to treat.

Results: Major follow-up will be performed at 3, 5 and 10 years and final study result after 15 years.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00662480.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Expected flow-chart concerning vascular screening (VIVA) for peripheral arterial disease, abdominal aortic aneurysm and hypertension.

References

    1. Lindholt JS, Juul S, Fasting H, Henneberg EW. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: single centre randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2005;11:750. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38369.620162.82. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ehlers L, Overvad K, Sorensen J, Christensen S, Bech M, Kjolby M. Analysis of cost effectiveness of screening Danish men aged 65 for abdominal aortic aneurysm. BMJ. 2009;11:b2243. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2243. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. The Danish health economic modelling study on AAA screening is flawed. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/338/jun24_2/b2243#216533
    1. Thompson SG, Ashton HA, Gao L, Scott RA. Screening men for abdominal aortic aneurysm: 10 year mortality and cost effectiveness results from the randomised Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study. BMJ. 2009;11:b2307. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2307. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smoking, lung function and the prognosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm. The UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000;11:636–642. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2000.1066. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data