Design of a Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) on the effectiveness of a Dutch patient advocacy case management intervention among severely disabled Multiple Sclerosis patients
- PMID: 20507600
- PMCID: PMC2890641
- DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-142
Design of a Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) on the effectiveness of a Dutch patient advocacy case management intervention among severely disabled Multiple Sclerosis patients
Abstract
Background: Case management has been suggested as an innovative strategy that facilitates the improvement of a patient's quality of life, reduction of hospital length of stay, optimization of self-care and improvement of satisfaction of patients and professionals involved. However, there is little evidence about the effectiveness of the patient advocacy case management model in clinical practice.Therefore, the objective of our study was to examine the effects of the Dutch patient advocacy case management model for severely disabled Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients and their caregivers compared to usual care.
Methods/design: In this randomized controlled trial the effectiveness of casemanagement on quality of life of patients and their caregivers, quality of care, service use and economic aspects were evaluated. The primary outcomes of this study were quality of life of MS-patients and caregiver burden of caregivers.Furthermore, we examined quality of life of caregivers, quality of care, service use and costs.
Discussion: This is a unique trial in which we examined the effectiveness of case management from a broad perspective. We meticulously prepared this study and applied important features and created important conditions for both intervention and research protocol to increase the likelihood of finding evidence for the effectiveness of patient advocacy case management. Concerning the intervention we anticipated to five important conditions: 1) the contrast between the case management intervention compared to the usual care seems to be large enough to detect intervention effects; 2) we included patients with complex care situations and/or were at risk for critical situations; 3) the case managers were familiar with disease specific health-problems and a broad spectrum of solutions; 4) case managers were competent and authorized to perform a medical neurological examination and worked closely with neurologists specialized in MS; and 5) the case managers had a regional network of professionals and health care organisations at their disposal, and were accepted as a coordinator of care. We also put a lot of effort on the selection of eligible patients, randomization and statistical methods, but also on power analysis, selection of reliable, validated and sensitive outcome measures, and (statistical) control of confounders.
Trial registration: Dutch Trial Register http://www.trialregister.nl. Trial ID: NTR762.
Figures
Similar articles
-
MSmonitor-plus program and video calling care (MPVC) for multidisciplinary care and self-management in multiple sclerosis: study protocol of a single-center randomized, parallel-group, open label, non-inferiority trial.BMC Neurol. 2022 Nov 12;22(1):423. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02948-z. BMC Neurol. 2022. PMID: 36371162 Free PMC article.
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
(Cost)-effectiveness of case-management by district nurses among primary informal caregivers of older adults with dementia symptoms and the older adults who receive informal care: design of a randomized controlled trial [ISCRTN83135728].BMC Public Health. 2005 Dec 12;5:133. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-133. BMC Public Health. 2005. PMID: 16343336 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. doi: 10.3310/hta5210. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532238 Review.
-
Integrating palliative care in patients with advanced multiple sclerosis: a scoping review.Ann Palliat Med. 2024 Mar;13(2):386-396. doi: 10.21037/apm-23-455. Ann Palliat Med. 2024. PMID: 38584475
Cited by
-
"So at least now I know how to deal with things myself, what I can do if it gets really bad again"-experiences with a long-term cross-sectoral advocacy care and case management for severe multiple sclerosis: a qualitative study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 10;24(1):453. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10851-1. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 38600493 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility of a psychosocial rehabilitation intervention to enhance the involvement of relatives in cancer rehabilitation: pilot study for a randomized controlled trial.Patient. 2013;6(3):201-12. doi: 10.1007/s40271-013-0019-y. Patient. 2013. PMID: 23821379 Clinical Trial.
-
The effect of nurse practitioner (NP-led) care on health-related quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis - a randomized trial.BMC Neurol. 2022 Jul 25;22(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02809-9. BMC Neurol. 2022. PMID: 35879701 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Communication, Coordination, and Security for People with Multiple Sclerosis (COCOS-MS): a randomised phase II clinical trial protocol.BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 25;12(1):e049300. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049300. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35078833 Free PMC article.
-
Health-related quality of life in partners of persons with MS: a longitudinal 10-year perspective.BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 16;4(12):e006097. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006097. BMJ Open. 2014. PMID: 25515842 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Long MJ. Case management model or case manager type? That is the question. Health Care Manager. 2002;20:53–65. - PubMed
-
- Zwarenstein M, Stephenson B, Johnston L. Case management: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. (Protocol) The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2005;2000:CD002797. DOI:10.1002/1465 1858,CD002797.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical